• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种监测和评估社区健康联盟的方法。

A methodology for monitoring and evaluating community health coalitions.

作者信息

Francisco V T, Paine A L, Fawcett S B

机构信息

Department of Human Development, University of Kansas, Lawrence 66045.

出版信息

Health Educ Res. 1993 Sep;8(3):403-16. doi: 10.1093/her/8.3.403.

DOI:10.1093/her/8.3.403
PMID:10146477
Abstract

Community coalitions are prominent mechanisms for building local capacities to address health and social concerns. Although there are case studies and descriptive reports on coalitions, there is little empirical information about coalition process and outcome. This paper describes a case study using a methodology for monitoring and evaluating community health coalitions. Data are fed back to coalition leaders and members, funding agents, and other relevant audiences as part of the development process. The monitoring system provides data on eight key measures of coalition process and outcome: the number of members, planning products, financial resources generated, dollars obtained, volunteers recruited, services provided, community actions and community changes. Illustrative data are presented for two different community health coalitions. Finally, challenges and opportunities in evaluating community coalitions are discussed.

摘要

社区联盟是建设地方能力以解决健康和社会问题的重要机制。尽管有关于联盟的案例研究和描述性报告,但关于联盟过程和结果的实证信息却很少。本文描述了一个使用监测和评估社区健康联盟方法的案例研究。作为发展过程的一部分,数据会反馈给联盟领导人和成员、资助机构及其他相关受众。该监测系统提供有关联盟过程和结果的八项关键指标的数据:成员数量、规划成果、产生的财政资源、获得的资金、招募的志愿者、提供的服务、社区行动和社区变化。文中给出了两个不同社区健康联盟的说明性数据。最后,讨论了评估社区联盟时面临的挑战和机遇。

相似文献

1
A methodology for monitoring and evaluating community health coalitions.一种监测和评估社区健康联盟的方法。
Health Educ Res. 1993 Sep;8(3):403-16. doi: 10.1093/her/8.3.403.
2
Identifying training and technical assistance needs in community coalitions: a developmental approach.识别社区联盟中的培训和技术援助需求:一种发展性方法。
Health Educ Res. 1993 Sep;8(3):417-32. doi: 10.1093/her/8.3.417.
3
Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion.社区预防与健康促进联盟
Health Educ Res. 1993 Sep;8(3):315-30. doi: 10.1093/her/8.3.315.
4
Complexities of coalition building: leaders' successes, strategies, struggles, and solutions.联盟建设的复杂性:领导者的成功、策略、困境及解决方案。
Soc Work. 2001 Jan;46(1):63-78. doi: 10.1093/sw/46.1.63.
5
Initiatives of 11 rural Appalachian cancer coalitions in Pennsylvania and New York.宾夕法尼亚州和纽约州11个阿巴拉契亚农村癌症联盟的倡议。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Oct;3(4):A122. Epub 2006 Sep 15.
6
Assessing Rural Health Coalitions Using the Public Health Logic Model: A Systematic Review.运用公共卫生逻辑模型评估农村卫生联盟:系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Jun;58(6):864-878. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.01.015.
7
The role of a community coalition in the development of health services for the poor and uninsured.
Int J Health Serv. 1996;26(1):93-110. doi: 10.2190/T3RN-0578-6U4M-CNNN.
8
Defining elements of success: a critical pathway of coalition development.定义成功要素:联盟发展的关键路径。
Health Promot Pract. 2008 Apr;9(2):130-9. doi: 10.1177/1524839907311573.
9
Building successful coalitions for promoting advance care planning.建立促进预先护理计划的成功联盟。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2006 Mar-Apr;23(2):119-26. doi: 10.1177/104990910602300209.
10
Building successful coalitions to promote advance care planning.建立成功的联盟以促进预立医疗计划。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2005 Nov-Dec;22(6):437-41. doi: 10.1177/104990910502200609.

引用本文的文献

1
Construct validation of the Research Engagement Survey Tool (REST).研究参与度调查工具(REST)的结构效度验证。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Jun 16;8(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00360-y.
2
Reaching Consensus on Principles of Stakeholder Engagement in Research.达成利益相关者参与研究原则的共识。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2020;14(1):117-127. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0014.
3
Out of the Lab: Shaping an Ecological and Constructional Cultural Systems Science.走出实验室:塑造生态与建构文化系统科学
Perspect Behav Sci. 2019 Jun 17;42(4):713-731. doi: 10.1007/s40614-019-00208-z. eCollection 2019 Dec.
4
EVALUATING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IN RESEARCH: QUANTITATIVE MEASURE DEVELOPMENT.评估研究中的社区参与:定量测量方法的开发
J Community Psychol. 2017 Jan;45(1):17-32. doi: 10.1002/jcop.21828. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
5
Systematic Review of Quantitative Measures of Stakeholder Engagement.利益相关者参与度定量测量的系统评价
Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Sep;10(5):314-336. doi: 10.1111/cts.12474. Epub 2017 May 29.
6
Using evaluability assessment to assess local community development health programmes: a Scottish case-study.运用可评估性评估来评价地方社区发展健康项目:一项苏格兰案例研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Apr 21;17(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0334-4.
7
Creating Youth-Supportive Communities: Outcomes from the Connect-to-Protect® (C2P) Structural Change Approach to Youth HIV Prevention.创建支持青年的社区:“连接以保护”(C2P)青少年艾滋病毒预防结构变革方法的成果
J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Feb;45(2):301-15. doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0379-9. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
8
Engaging the underserved: a process model to mobilize rural community health coalitions as partners in translational research.服务未得到充分满足的人群:一种将农村社区健康联盟动员为转化研究合作伙伴的过程模型。
Clin Transl Sci. 2014 Aug;7(4):300-6. doi: 10.1111/cts.12168. Epub 2014 May 19.
9
Differential challenges in coalition building among HIV prevention coalitions targeting specific youth populations.针对特定青年人群的艾滋病预防联盟在联盟建设中面临的不同挑战。
J Prev Interv Community. 2012;40(2):131-48. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2012.660124.
10
Perspectives of community partners and researchers about factors impacting coalition functioning over time.社区合作伙伴和研究人员对随时间影响联盟运作的因素的看法。
J Prev Interv Community. 2012;40(2):87-102. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2012.660120.