• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过联合分析确定项目偏好:来自家长样本的说明性结果。

Identifying program preferences through conjoint analysis: illustrative results from a parent sample.

作者信息

Spoth R, Redmond C

机构信息

Social and Behavioral Research Center for Rural Health, Iowa State University, Ames 50010.

出版信息

Am J Health Promot. 1993 Nov-Dec;8(2):124-33. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-8.2.124.

DOI:10.4278/0890-1171-8.2.124
PMID:10146557
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article is to illustrate the application of conjoint analysis, a consumer research technique, using data from a survey of parents' preferences for prevention programs.

DESIGN

This study utilized a one-time, cross-sectional telephone survey.

SETTING

Data were collected from subjects living in economically disadvantaged rural midwestern counties.

SUBJECTS

Subjects were 202 randomly selected parents with preadolescents who indicated interest in family-focused prevention programs.

MEASURES

Conjoint analysis software was employed in computer-assisted telephone interviews to evaluate relative preferences for 39 individual features of family-focused prevention programs falling under 11 categories (e.g., program meeting time, facilitator background). The software also guided computer simulations of parent choices among four types of programs.

RESULTS

Findings indicated that meeting time was the most important category of program features. Strongly preferred individual features included meetings scheduled on weekday evenings, instruction by child development specialists, and programs based on extensive research. Two multiple-session programs evaluated via computer simulations incorporated several preferred features and received higher ratings than did single-session programs. Estimated variance z-tests indicated limited differences in perceived importance of program feature categories across sociodemographic subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings highlight a) differences in the relative value parents place on various features of prevention programs in the surveyed population and b) the importance of practical aspects of program delivery.

摘要

目的

本文旨在通过一项关于家长对预防项目偏好的调查数据,阐述联合分析(一种消费者研究技术)的应用。

设计

本研究采用一次性横断面电话调查。

背景

数据收集自生活在中西部经济贫困农村县的受试者。

对象

对象为202名随机选取的有青春期前子女且表示对以家庭为中心的预防项目感兴趣的家长。

测量方法

在计算机辅助电话访谈中使用联合分析软件,以评估家长对属于11个类别的以家庭为中心的预防项目的39个个体特征的相对偏好(例如,项目会议时间、主持人背景)。该软件还指导了对四种类型项目中家长选择的计算机模拟。

结果

研究结果表明,会议时间是项目特征中最重要的类别。强烈偏好的个体特征包括在工作日晚上安排会议、由儿童发展专家授课以及基于广泛研究的项目。通过计算机模拟评估的两个多阶段项目纳入了几个偏好特征,并且比单阶段项目获得了更高的评分。估计方差z检验表明,不同社会人口亚组对项目特征类别的重要性认知差异有限。

结论

研究结果突出了以下两点:a)在被调查人群中,家长对预防项目各种特征的相对重视程度存在差异;b)项目实施实际方面的重要性。

相似文献

1
Identifying program preferences through conjoint analysis: illustrative results from a parent sample.通过联合分析确定项目偏好:来自家长样本的说明性结果。
Am J Health Promot. 1993 Nov-Dec;8(2):124-33. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-8.2.124.
2
Parents' preferences for services for children with hearing loss: a conjoint analysis study.父母对听力损失儿童服务的偏好:一项联合分析研究。
Ear Hear. 2007 Dec;28(6):842-9. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318157676d.
3
Simulating smokers' acceptance of modifications in a cessation program.模拟吸烟者对戒烟计划中各项调整的接受程度。
Public Health Rep. 1992 Jan-Feb;107(1):81-92.
4
Formative research on smoking cessation program attributes preferred by smokers.针对吸烟者偏好的戒烟项目属性的形成性研究。
Am J Health Promot. 1991 May-Jun;5(5):346-54. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-5.5.346.
5
Parents' preferences for enhanced access in the pediatric medical home: a discrete choice experiment.父母对加强儿科医疗之家服务可及性的偏好:一项离散选择实验
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Apr;169(4):358-64. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3534.
6
Preferences for Parenting Programs in Head Start: Using Conjoint Analysis to Understand Engagement in Parenting Health Promotion Programs.家长对“学步儿童早期教育计划”项目的偏好:使用联合分析来理解家长对育儿健康促进项目的参与度。
Prev Sci. 2021 Oct;22(7):866-879. doi: 10.1007/s11121-021-01288-7. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
7
Socioeconomic factors and parents' preferences for internet- and mobile-based parenting interventions to prevent youth mental health problems: A discrete choice experiment.社会经济因素以及父母对基于互联网和移动设备的育儿干预措施预防青少年心理健康问题的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Internet Interv. 2022 Mar 8;28:100522. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100522. eCollection 2022 Apr.
8
Consumer-focused data collection in prevention program evaluation. Rationale and illustrations.
Eval Health Prof. 1993 Sep;16(3):278-94. doi: 10.1177/016327879301600302.
9
Principals and tools for evaluating community-based prevention and health promotion programs.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 1998 Mar;4(2):37-47. doi: 10.1097/00124784-199803000-00006.
10
A comparison of Omaha worksite health promotion activities to the 1992 national survey with a special perspective on program intervention.将奥马哈工作场所健康促进活动与1992年全国调查进行比较,并特别关注项目干预。
Am J Health Promot. 1995 Nov-Dec;10(2):132-9. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-10.2.132.

引用本文的文献

1
Promoting Enrollment in Parenting Programs Among a Filipino Population: A Randomized Trial.促进菲律宾人群参与育儿项目:一项随机试验。
Pediatrics. 2019 Feb;143(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-0553.
2
Barriers to Participation in Parenting Programs: The Relationship between Parenting Stress, Perceived Barriers, and Program Completion.参与育儿项目的障碍:育儿压力、感知障碍与项目完成之间的关系。
J Child Fam Stud. 2018 Apr;27(4):1264-1274. doi: 10.1007/s10826-017-0963-6. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
3
The marketing plan and outcome indicators for recruiting and retaining parents in the HomeStyles randomized controlled trial.
“家庭风格”随机对照试验中招募和留住家长的营销计划及成果指标。
Trials. 2017 Nov 15;18(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2262-3.
4
The effectiveness of online, family-based media literacy education for substance abuse prevention in elementary school children: Study of the Media Detective Family program.基于家庭的在线媒体素养教育对小学生预防药物滥用的有效性:媒体侦探家庭项目研究
J Community Psychol. 2017 Aug;45(6):796-809. doi: 10.1002/jcop.21893. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
5
Examining Parents' Preferences for Group and Individual Parent Training for Children with ADHD Symptoms.考察父母对患有多动症症状儿童的团体和个体家长培训的偏好。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2016 Sep-Oct;45(5):614-631. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2015.1004678. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
6
Predictors of participation in parenting workshops for improving adolescent behavioral and mental health: results from the common sense parenting trial.参与育儿工作坊以改善青少年行为和心理健康的预测因素:常识育儿试验结果
J Prim Prev. 2015 Apr;36(2):105-18. doi: 10.1007/s10935-015-0386-3.
7
Recruiting Fathers to Parenting Programs: Advice from Dads and Fatherhood Program Providers.招募父亲参与育儿项目:来自父亲们和父亲身份项目提供者的建议。
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2013 Oct 1;35(10):1734-1741. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.07.004.
8
Surviving or thriving: quality assurance mechanisms to promote innovation in the development of evidence-based parenting interventions.生存还是繁荣:促进循证育儿干预措施发展创新的质量保证机制
Prev Sci. 2015 Apr;16(3):421-31. doi: 10.1007/s11121-014-0475-1.
9
Addressing core challenges for the next generation of type 2 translation research and systems: the translation science to population impact (TSci Impact) framework.解决 2 型糖尿病转化研究和系统的下一代核心挑战:转化科学到人群影响 (TSci Impact) 框架。
Prev Sci. 2013 Aug;14(4):319-51. doi: 10.1007/s11121-012-0362-6.
10
Providing information to parents of children with mental health problems: a discrete choice conjoint analysis of professional preferences.为有心理健康问题儿童的家长提供信息:专业偏好的离散选择联合分析。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2009 Nov;37(8):1089-102. doi: 10.1007/s10802-009-9338-9.