Zickafoose Joseph S, DeCamp Lisa R, Prosser Lisa A
Mathematica Policy Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan3Child Health Evaluation and Research (CHEAR) Unit, Division of General Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Division of General Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Apr;169(4):358-64. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3534.
Efforts to transform primary care through the medical home model may have limited effectiveness if they do not incorporate families' preferences for different primary care services.
To assess parents' relative preferences for different categories of enhanced access services in primary care.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Internet-based survey that took place with a national online panel from December 8, 2011, to December 22, 2011. Participants included 820 parents of children aged 0 to 17 years. Hispanic and black non-Hispanic parents were each oversampled to 20% of the sample. The survey included a discrete choice experiment with questions that asked parents to choose between hypothetical primary care practices with different levels of enhanced access and other primary care services.
We estimated parents' relative preferences for different enhanced access services using travel time to the practice as a trade-off and parents' marginal willingness to travel in minutes for practices with different levels of services.
The response rate of parents who participated in the study was 41.2%. Parents were most likely to choose primary care offices that guaranteed same-day sick visits (coefficient, 0.57 [SE, 0.05]; P < .001) followed by those with higher professional continuity (coefficient, 0.36 [SE, 0.03]; P < .001). Parents were also significantly more likely to choose practices with 24-hour telephone advice plus nonurgent email advice (0.08 [0.04]; P < .05), evening hours 4 or more times a week (0.14 [0.04]; P < .001), and at least some hours on weekends. Parents were significantly less likely to choose practices that were closed during some weekday daytime hours or had wait times longer than 4 weeks for preventive care visits. There was very little variation in preferences among parents with different sociodemographic characteristics. Parents' marginal willingness to travel was 14 minutes (95% CI, 11-16 minutes) for guaranteed same-day sick visits and 44 minutes (95% CI, 37-51 minutes) for an office with idealized levels of all services.
As primary care practices for children implement aspects of the medical home model, those that emphasize same-day sick care and professional continuity are more likely to meet parents' preferences for enhanced access. Practices should seek to engage families in prioritizing changes in practice services as part of medical home implementation.
如果通过医疗之家模式转变初级保健的努力没有纳入家庭对不同初级保健服务的偏好,那么这些努力的效果可能有限。
评估家长对初级保健中不同类别的增强可及性服务的相对偏好。
设计、设置和参与者:2011年12月8日至2011年12月22日对全国在线小组进行的基于互联网的调查。参与者包括820名0至17岁儿童的家长。西班牙裔和非西班牙裔黑人家长在样本中各超抽样至20%。该调查包括一个离散选择实验,其中的问题要求家长在具有不同增强可及性水平的假设初级保健机构和其他初级保健服务之间进行选择。
我们以前往医疗机构的时间作为权衡因素,估计家长对不同增强可及性服务的相对偏好,以及家长为具有不同服务水平的医疗机构愿意额外花费的出行时间(以分钟计)。
参与研究的家长的回复率为41.2%。家长最有可能选择保证当日就诊的初级保健诊所(系数为0.57[标准误为0.05];P < .001),其次是专业连续性较高的诊所(系数为0.36[标准误为0.03];P < .001)。家长也显著更有可能选择提供24小时电话咨询加非紧急电子邮件咨询的诊所(0.08[0.04];P < .05)、每周有4次或更多次晚间服务的诊所(0.14[0.04];P < .001)以及至少在周末有一些服务时间的诊所。家长显著不太可能选择在工作日某些白天时段关闭或预防性保健就诊等待时间超过4周的诊所。不同社会人口学特征的家长之间的偏好差异很小。对于保证当日就诊的诊所,家长愿意额外花费的出行时间为14分钟(95%置信区间为11 - 16分钟);对于所有服务都达到理想水平的诊所,家长愿意额外花费的出行时间为44分钟(95%置信区间为37 - 51分钟)。
随着儿童初级保健机构实施医疗之家模式的各个方面,那些强调当日病护理和专业连续性的机构更有可能满足家长对增强可及性的偏好。在实施医疗之家模式的过程中,医疗机构应让家庭参与确定实践服务变化的优先顺序。