Suppr超能文献

经胸生物阻抗法与热稀释法测量危重症患者心输出量的可重复性及比较

Reproducibility and comparison of cardiac output measurement by transthoracic bioimpedance and thermodilution methods in critically ill patients.

作者信息

Ng H W, Coleman N, Walley T J, Mostafa S M, Breckenridge A M

机构信息

Departments of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, UK.

出版信息

Clin Intensive Care. 1993;4(5):217-21.

Abstract

The short-term reproducibility in cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume (SV) measurements by transthoracic electrical bioimpedance (TEB) and thermodilution (TH) and their agreement were studied in 31 consecutive patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). For comparison of changes in CO and SV, six patients were studied separately. TEB data were not obtainable in four patients due to interference with impedance signals or heart rate detection. Both methods were reproducible. For TEB, the mean difference of duplicate measurements was 0.03 (SD 0.3) l/min for CO and 0.3 (SD 3.2) ml for SV. For TH, it was -0.04 (SD 0.5) l/min for CO and 0.6 (SD 6.6) ml for SV. The coefficient of reproducibility for CO was thus 0.6 l/min for TEB and 1.0 l/min for TH and that for SV was 6.4 ml for TEB and 13.2 ml for TH. There was no agreement in absolute CO or SV between the methods; TEB giving lower absolute readings. The mean difference (TH-TEB) was 1.4 (SD 1.4) l/min for CO and 14 (SD 13.4) ml for SV. There was, however, good correlation between the two methods. For CO, the regression equation was TEB=0.623+0.739 (TH); (p less than 0.0005, r=0.87). For SV, the regression equation was TEB=-0.23+0.823 (TH); (p less than 0.0005, r=0.86). When only changes were considered, the mean difference (TH-TEB) was -0.5 (SD 0.9) l/min for CO and -4 (SD 8) ml for SV. There was significant correlation in the changes detected by each method.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在重症监护病房(ICU)的31例连续患者中,研究了经胸电阻抗(TEB)和热稀释法(TH)测量心输出量(CO)和每搏输出量(SV)的短期重复性及其一致性。为比较CO和SV的变化,另外对6例患者进行了单独研究。4例患者因阻抗信号或心率检测受干扰而无法获得TEB数据。两种方法均具有可重复性。对于TEB,CO重复测量的平均差值为0.03(标准差0.3)升/分钟,SV为0.3(标准差3.2)毫升。对于TH,CO为-0.04(标准差0.5)升/分钟,SV为0.6(标准差6.6)毫升。因此,TEB测量CO的可重复性系数为0.6升/分钟,TH为1.0升/分钟;TEB测量SV的可重复性系数为6.4毫升,TH为13.2毫升。两种方法在绝对CO或SV上不一致;TEB的绝对读数较低。CO的平均差值(TH - TEB)为1.4(标准差1.4)升/分钟,SV为14(标准差13.4)毫升。然而,两种方法之间存在良好的相关性。对于CO,回归方程为TEB = 0.623 + 0.739(TH);(p < 0.0005,r = 0.87)。对于SV,回归方程为TEB = -0.23 + 0.823(TH);(p < 0.0005,r = 0.86)。仅考虑变化时,CO的平均差值(TH - TEB)为-0.5(标准差0.9)升/分钟,SV为-4(标准差8)毫升。两种方法检测到的变化存在显著相关性。(摘要截于250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验