Suppr超能文献

危重症患者的心输出量测量:胸部电阻抗法与热稀释法的比较

Cardiac output measurement in critical care patients: Thoracic Electrical Bioimpedance versus thermodilution.

作者信息

Clancy T V, Norman K, Reynolds R, Covington D, Maxwell J G

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1991 Aug;31(8):1116-20; discussion 1120-1.

PMID:1875438
Abstract

Thoracic Electrical Bioimpedance (TEB) is a method for measuring cardiac performance which is noninvasive, continuous, has minimal technical requirements, and no patient risk. We used a commercially available TEB device to measure cardiac output in patients with thermodilution catheters in place. We compared the cardiac output measurements for the two modalities. We also compared the average hospital cost for initial cardiac assessment using the two techniques. The mean difference between the two cardiac output measurements was small (0.23 +/- 0.56) and not affected by the magnitude of the cardiac output readings. There was a strong correlation between COTD and COTEB (r = 0.91) and the regression slope was 0.91 with a Y intercept of 0.76. Cost analysis demonstrated that the use of TEB was approximately $600 less than thermodilution. Thoracic electrical bioimpedance measurement of cardiac output may offer a valuable alternative to the invasive measurement of the thermodilution catheter.

摘要

胸电阻抗(TEB)是一种测量心脏功能的方法,它具有非侵入性、连续性、技术要求极低且对患者无风险的特点。我们使用一种商用TEB设备对已放置热稀释导管的患者测量心输出量。我们比较了两种方法测得的心输出量。我们还比较了使用这两种技术进行初始心脏评估的平均住院费用。两种心输出量测量结果之间的平均差异很小(0.23±0.56),且不受心输出量读数大小的影响。热稀释法测得的心输出量(COTD)与胸电阻抗法测得的心输出量(COTEB)之间存在很强的相关性(r = 0.91),回归斜率为0.91,Y轴截距为0.76。成本分析表明,使用TEB的费用比热稀释法大约少600美元。胸电阻抗法测量心输出量可能为热稀释导管的侵入性测量提供一种有价值的替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验