Detsky A S
Departments of Health Administration and Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Pharmacoeconomics. 1994 Oct;6(4):281-8. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199406040-00002.
The growth of expenditures on healthcare and pharmaceutical products is a concern to third-party payers because of the absence of market discipline (price signals that consumers face). Cost-effectiveness analysis is a method that allows third-party payers to systematically make judgements about the 'value for money' of these products. It moves beyond simple unit price comparisons of alternate interventions/products to consider the full stream of relevant cost and benefits. As formulary committees begin to adopt the systematic use of cost-effectiveness analyses to inform the debate, the exercise will move from an academic to a more practical application. This transition will require several important changes including defining the purpose of cost-effectiveness analysis, measurement of outcomes and data, format of reports, and contractual arrangements between the pharmaceutical industry and analysts. As more 'real world' experience is gained in the practical application of cost-effectiveness analysis, the quality of data will improve as will its value as an aid to decision making.
由于缺乏市场约束(消费者面临的价格信号),医疗保健和药品支出的增长受到第三方支付者的关注。成本效益分析是一种使第三方支付者能够系统地对这些产品的“性价比”做出判断的方法。它超越了对替代干预措施/产品的简单单价比较,转而考虑相关成本和效益的全部流程。随着处方委员会开始系统地运用成本效益分析来为辩论提供信息,这项工作将从学术层面转向更实际的应用。这种转变将需要一些重要的改变,包括明确成本效益分析的目的、结果和数据的衡量、报告的格式,以及制药行业与分析师之间的合同安排。随着在成本效益分析的实际应用中获得更多“现实世界”的经验,数据质量将会提高,其作为决策辅助工具的价值也会提高。