Gourlay T, Fleming J, Taylor K M
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
Perfusion. 1992 Jul;7(3):227-32. doi: 10.1177/026765919200700308.
The Pall LG6 arterial line filter has, in a previous publication, demonstrated its inherent leukocyte depleting qualities. This initial study was however carried out under continuous flow conditions. The present study was designed to assess the effectiveness of the LG6 filter in performing this leukocyte removal function under the more dynamic conditions of pulsatile flow. In addition to leukocyte depletion, the general blood handling and degree of energy absorption associated with the LG6 and Stat-Prime filters was also assessed. The results demonstrated that the LG6 filter was unaffected by the flow regime employed in terms of leukocyte removal and platelet depletion. There was a higher level of measured haemolysis associated with the use of pulsatile rather than nonpulsatile flow, however, this was the case with both filter types and was not found to be the case when generated values were computed. The LG6 filter absorbed more energy than the Stat-Prime filter as reflected by energy equivalent pressure (EEP) measurement, but this difference did not reach a level which was considered to be clinically significant.
在之前的一篇出版物中,颇尔LG6动脉管路过滤器已证明其固有的白细胞清除能力。然而,最初的这项研究是在连续流动条件下进行的。本研究旨在评估LG6过滤器在更具动态性的脉动流条件下执行这种白细胞清除功能的有效性。除了白细胞清除外,还评估了与LG6和Stat-Prime过滤器相关的一般血液处理情况以及能量吸收程度。结果表明,就白细胞清除和血小板消耗而言,LG6过滤器不受所采用的流动方式的影响。与使用非脉动流相比,使用脉动流时测得的溶血水平更高,不过,两种过滤器类型都是这种情况,并且在计算生成值时未发现这种情况。如能量等效压力(EEP)测量所反映的那样,LG6过滤器比Stat-Prime过滤器吸收更多能量,但这种差异未达到被认为具有临床意义的水平。