• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区动员与健康促进:关键组织的识别

Community activation and health promotion: identification of key organizations.

作者信息

Von Korff M, Wickizer T, Maeser J, O'Leary P, Pearson D, Beery W

机构信息

Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, Seattle, Washington 98101.

出版信息

Am J Health Promot. 1992 Nov-Dec;7(2):110-7. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-7.2.110.

DOI:10.4278/0890-1171-7.2.110
PMID:10148715
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to identify the kinds of community organizations community leaders consider important for community health promotion efforts.

DESIGN

Key informants were identified by reputational sampling of organizations relevant to community health promotion. Key informants were asked to list organizations they considered important for community health promotion. Differences in identified organizations were compared across informants from seven urban, five suburban, seven rural, and three Native American communities, with significance evaluated by chi-square tests.

SETTING

This survey was conducted in 22 Western U.S. communities comprising the intervention and control communities of the Community Health Promotion Grants Program of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

SUBJECTS

Key informants (N = 184) from community organizations, identified using a reputational sampling technique beginning with the health department, were interviewed by telephone.

MEASURES

Key informants listed organizations considered important for community health promotion in five areas: adolescent pregnancy, substance abuse, tobacco use, cancer, and cardiovascular disease.

RESULTS

Informants frequently identified the health department (mentioned by 78% of informants overall), schools (72%), governmental agencies (55%), hospitals (47%), health clinics (42%), churches (33%), and newspapers (32%) as important. Organizations more prominent in urban and suburban areas than in rural and Native American areas included television stations, health-related private nonprofit organizations, substance abuse treatment centers, and colleges. Private physicians were frequently identified in rural areas (44% of informants).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定社区领袖认为对社区健康促进工作重要的社区组织类型。

设计

通过对与社区健康促进相关组织的声誉抽样来确定关键信息提供者。要求关键信息提供者列出他们认为对社区健康促进重要的组织。比较来自7个城市、5个郊区、7个农村和3个美国原住民社区的信息提供者所确定组织的差异,通过卡方检验评估显著性。

背景

本调查在美国西部22个社区进行,这些社区包括亨利·J·凯泽家庭基金会社区健康促进资助项目的干预社区和对照社区。

对象

使用从卫生部门开始的声誉抽样技术确定的社区组织关键信息提供者(N = 184)通过电话进行访谈。

测量

关键信息提供者列出在五个领域对社区健康促进重要的组织:青少年怀孕、药物滥用、烟草使用、癌症和心血管疾病。

结果

信息提供者经常将卫生部门(总体上78%的信息提供者提及)、学校(72%)、政府机构(55%)、医院(47%)、健康诊所(42%)、教堂(33%)和报纸(32%)视为重要组织。在城市和郊区比在农村和美国原住民地区更突出的组织包括电视台、与健康相关的私人非营利组织、药物滥用治疗中心和学院。农村地区经常提到私人医生(44%的信息提供者)。(摘要截短为250字)

相似文献

1
Community activation and health promotion: identification of key organizations.社区动员与健康促进:关键组织的识别
Am J Health Promot. 1992 Nov-Dec;7(2):110-7. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-7.2.110.
2
The Kaiser Family Foundation Community Health Promotion Grants Program: findings from an outcome evaluation.凯撒家庭基金会社区健康促进资助项目:一项成果评估的结果
Health Serv Res. 2000 Aug;35(3):561-89.
3
Impact of a community health promotion program on existing organizations: the Minnesota Heart Health Program.一项社区健康促进项目对现有组织的影响:明尼苏达心脏健康项目
Soc Sci Med. 1992 Mar;34(6):639-48. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90191-r.
4
A community-based approach to preventing alcohol use among adolescents on an American Indian reservation.一种基于社区的方法,用于预防美国印第安人保留地青少年的酒精使用。
Public Health Rep. 1995 Jul-Aug;110(4):439-47.
5
Implementation of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation's Community Health Promotion Grant Program: a process evaluation.亨利·J·凯泽家庭基金会社区健康促进资助项目的实施:一项过程评估
Milbank Q. 1998;76(1):121-47. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00081.
6
Building Capacity to Increase Health Promotion Funding to American Indian Communities: Recommendations From Community Members.增强向美国印第安社区提供健康促进资金的能力:社区成员的建议
Health Promot Pract. 2016 Nov;17(6):907-914. doi: 10.1177/1524839915622195. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
7
Current status of health promotion activities in four midwest cities.中西部四个城市健康促进活动的现状
Public Health Rep. 1991 May-Jun;106(3):310-7.
8
What can community organizations do for tobacco control?
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2006 Summer;29(1):51-82.
9
Localized Health News Releases and Community Newspapers: A Method for Rural Health Promotion.地方健康新闻稿与社区报纸:一种农村健康促进方法
Health Promot Pract. 2015 Jul;16(4):492-500. doi: 10.1177/1524839915580538. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
10
A critique of contemporary community health promotion approaches: based on a qualitative review of six programs in Maine.对当代社区健康促进方法的批判:基于对缅因州六个项目的定性综述
Am J Health Promot. 1993 Jan-Feb;7(3):208-20. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-7.3.208.

引用本文的文献

1
[Evaluation of the viability and validity of an instrument to measure community activation].[评估一种测量社区活跃度的工具的可行性和有效性]
Can J Public Health. 2002 Jul-Aug;93(4):271-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03405015.