• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Implementation of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation's Community Health Promotion Grant Program: a process evaluation.亨利·J·凯泽家庭基金会社区健康促进资助项目的实施:一项过程评估
Milbank Q. 1998;76(1):121-47. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00081.
2
The Kaiser Family Foundation Community Health Promotion Grants Program: findings from an outcome evaluation.凯撒家庭基金会社区健康促进资助项目:一项成果评估的结果
Health Serv Res. 2000 Aug;35(3):561-89.
3
The evaluation of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation's Community Health Promotion Grant Program: design.亨利·J·凯泽家庭基金会社区健康促进资助项目评估:设计
J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(7):685-99. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90029-9.
4
Evaluating the California Wellness Foundation's Health Improvement Initiative: a logic model approach.评估加州健康基金会的健康改善倡议:一种逻辑模型方法。
Health Promot Pract. 2003 Apr;4(2):146-56. doi: 10.1177/1524839902250767.
5
The California wellness foundation's Health Improvement Initiative: evaluation findings and lessons learned.加利福尼亚健康基金会的健康改善计划:评估结果与经验教训
Am J Health Promot. 2005 Mar-Apr;19(4):286-96. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-19.4.286.
6
Turning point: the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's effort to revitalize public health at the state level.转折点:罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会在州一级振兴公共卫生的努力。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2002 Jan;8(1):1-5. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200201000-00002.
7
Target community foundations to fund family planning.
Contracept Technol Update. 1994 Apr;15(4):50-3.
8
Foundation work: the health promotion program of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
Am J Health Promot. 1987 Fall;2(2):74-80. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-2.2.74.
9
Examination of the relationship between community support and tobacco control activities as a part of youth empowerment programs.作为青年赋权项目的一部分,对社区支持与烟草控制活动之间的关系进行考察。
Health Educ Behav. 2004 Oct;31(5):629-40. doi: 10.1177/1090198104268680.
10
A quest for better contraception: the Ford Foundation's contribution to reproductive science and contraceptive development 1959-1983.对更好避孕方法的探索:福特基金会对生殖科学与避孕技术发展的贡献(1959 - 1983年)
Contraception. 1984 Feb;29(2):107-42. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(84)90024-6.

引用本文的文献

1
The American fentanyl epidemic: geographic variation in mortality and policy implications.美国芬太尼泛滥:死亡率的地理差异及政策影响
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Jun 25;3(7):qxaf124. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf124. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Community coalition-driven interventions to reduce health disparities among racial and ethnic minority populations.由社区联盟推动的干预措施,以减少种族和少数族裔人群之间的健康差距。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 15;2015(6):CD009905. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009905.pub2.
3
Measures of exposure to the Well London Phase-1 intervention and their association with health well-being and social outcomes.伦敦健康计划第一阶段干预措施的暴露情况及其与健康福祉和社会成果的关联。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Jul;68(7):597-605. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-202507. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
4
A new model of care collaboration for community-dwelling elders: findings and lessons learned from the NORC-Health Care linkage evaluation.社区居住老年人的新型护理合作模式:来自 NORC-Health Care 链接评估的发现和经验教训。
Int J Integr Care. 2011 Apr;11:e017. doi: 10.5334/ijic.518. Epub 2011 Apr 29.
5
Multisectoral lessons from healthy communities.多部门从健康社区中吸取的经验。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2010 Nov;7(6):A117. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
6
What is population health intervention research?什么是人群健康干预研究?
Can J Public Health. 2009 Jan-Feb;100(1):Suppl I8-14. doi: 10.1007/BF03405503.
7
Assessing the implementation of the chronic care model in quality improvement collaboratives.评估慢性病照护模式在质量改进协作中的实施情况。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Aug;40(4):978-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00397.x.
8
Exporting the Buyers Health Care Action Group purchasing model: lessons from other communities.推广买家医疗保健行动小组的采购模式:来自其他社区的经验教训。
Milbank Q. 2005;83(1):149-76. doi: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2005.00339.x.
9
A regional health care system partnership with local communities to impact chronic disease.一个与当地社区合作以影响慢性病的区域医疗保健系统。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2004 Oct;1(4):A16. Epub 2004 Sep 15.
10
Reconsidering community-based health promotion: promise, performance, and potential.重新审视基于社区的健康促进:前景、成效与潜力。
Am J Public Health. 2003 Apr;93(4):557-74. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.4.557.

亨利·J·凯泽家庭基金会社区健康促进资助项目的实施:一项过程评估

Implementation of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation's Community Health Promotion Grant Program: a process evaluation.

作者信息

Wickizer T M, Wagner E, Cheadle A, Pearson D, Beery W, Maeser J, Psaty B, VonKorff M, Koepsell T, Diehr P, Perrin E B

机构信息

Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle 98195-7660, USA.

出版信息

Milbank Q. 1998;76(1):121-47. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00081.

DOI:10.1111/1468-0009.00081
PMID:9510902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2751065/
Abstract

The Community Health Promotion Grants Program, sponsored by the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, represents a major health initiative that established 11 community health promotion projects. Successful implementation was characterized by several critical factors: (1) intervention activities; (2) community activation; (3) success in obtaining external funding; and (4) institutionalization. Analysis of the program was based on data from several sources: program reports, key informant surveys, and a community coalition survey. Results indicate that school-based programs focusing on adolescent health problems were the most successful in reaching the populations they were targeting. The majority of the programs were able to attract external funding, thereby adding to their initial resource base. The programs were less successful in generating health promotion activities and in achieving meaningful institutionalization in their communities.

摘要

由亨利·J·凯泽家庭基金会赞助的社区健康促进资助项目是一项重大的健康倡议,设立了11个社区健康促进项目。成功实施该项目具有几个关键因素:(1)干预活动;(2)社区动员;(3)成功获得外部资金;以及(4)制度化。对该项目的分析基于多个来源的数据:项目报告、关键信息提供者调查以及社区联盟调查。结果表明,专注于青少年健康问题的校本项目在覆盖其目标人群方面最为成功。大多数项目能够吸引外部资金,从而增加了其初始资源基础。这些项目在开展健康促进活动以及在其社区实现有意义的制度化方面不太成功。