Jønsson V, Clausen S R, Hansen M M
Department of Haematology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Pharmacoeconomics. 1995 Oct;8(4):275-81. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199508040-00002.
Assessments of the direct and indirect costs of cancer treatment have demonstrated the extreme complexity of these costs. Expenditure on cancer treatment is high, often reaching 3 to 6% of the gross national product in industrialised countries. In this article, we propose that the health outcomes associated with this high expenditure should be analysed in relation to concepts such as total cytoreduction (leading to disease-free survival and cure) and cytostabilisation with acceptable quality of life (in incurable cancer patients). Outcomes appear to be more variable among incurable compared with curable patients, so that cure and survival (which apply to only about 50% of all patients) are not the sole outcome parameters. For the 50% of patients in industrialised countries in whom cure is not possible, outcomes (in the form of cytostabilisation and an ongoing obligation to seek curative cytoreduction) will require further pharmacoeconomic assessment.
对癌症治疗直接和间接成本的评估表明了这些成本的极端复杂性。癌症治疗支出很高,在工业化国家通常达到国民生产总值的3%至6%。在本文中,我们建议应结合诸如完全细胞减灭(导致无病生存和治愈)以及在可接受的生活质量下实现细胞稳定(针对无法治愈的癌症患者)等概念来分析与这种高支出相关的健康结果。与可治愈患者相比,无法治愈患者的结果似乎更具变异性,因此治愈和生存(仅适用于约50%的所有患者)并非唯一的结果参数。对于工业化国家中50%无法治愈的患者,结果(以细胞稳定和持续寻求治愈性细胞减灭的义务形式)将需要进一步的药物经济学评估。