Spickett G P, Askew T, Chapel H M
Newcastle General Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Qual Health Care. 1995 Dec;4(4):263-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.4.4.263.
Variation in clinical practice and its effect on outcome is little known for rare diseases such as primary antibody deficiency. As part of a national audit a survey of all 30 consultant immunologists in the United Kingdom dealing with primary antibody deficiency syndromes in adults and children was carried out in 1993 to ascertain their practices in diagnosis and management. Consensus guidelines were published after the survey was completed. Comparison of the survey results of clinical practice at the time the guidelines were published with the standards identified highlighted that the practice of a minority of specialists was at variance with their peers and with the consensus document, particularly in the use of intramuscular immunoglobulin, the dose and frequency of intravenous immunoglobulin, and target trough immunoglobulin G concentration, which has implications for the quality of patient care. However, much closer agreement existed in the key areas of management, such as diagnosis and selection of intravenous immunoglobulin. The approach and the problems identified are relevant to the management of other rare diseases, in which diagnosis and management is complex and there are few specialists with the necessary knowledge to undertake such care. This survey, the first attempted audit of practice, shows that within a motivated group of specialists highly significant differences in practice may exist and the authors emphasise the importance of setting clear guidelines against which care can be assessed.
对于诸如原发性抗体缺陷这类罕见疾病,临床实践中的差异及其对治疗结果的影响鲜为人知。作为一项全国性审计的一部分,1993年对英国所有30名诊治成人和儿童原发性抗体缺陷综合征的顾问免疫学家进行了调查,以确定他们在诊断和管理方面的做法。调查完成后发布了共识指南。将指南发布时的临床实践调查结果与确定的标准进行比较后发现,少数专家的做法与同行以及共识文件存在差异,特别是在使用肌肉注射免疫球蛋白、静脉注射免疫球蛋白的剂量和频率以及目标谷免疫球蛋白G浓度方面,这对患者护理质量有影响。然而,在管理的关键领域,如诊断和静脉注射免疫球蛋白的选择方面,存在更为密切的一致性。所确定的方法和问题与其他罕见疾病的管理相关,在这些疾病中,诊断和管理很复杂,且很少有具备必要知识来提供此类护理的专家。这项首次尝试的实践审计调查表明,在一群积极主动的专家中,实践中可能存在非常显著的差异,作者强调制定明确指南以评估护理的重要性。