• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开展项目评估的障碍:对公共卫生评估人员的启示

Obstacles to conducting program evaluations: implications for public health evaluators.

作者信息

Holosko M J

机构信息

School of Social Work, University of Windsor, ON.

出版信息

J Health Soc Policy. 1996;8(1):91-101. doi: 10.1300/J045v08n01_08.

DOI:10.1300/J045v08n01_08
PMID:10162908
Abstract

This article presents a number of obstacles to conducting program evaluations which include: the "word" evaluation itself, the politics of evaluation, inadequate resources, the tendency of organizations to resist change, and a lack of understanding of the context of program evaluations. Underpinning these obstacles is the longstanding definitional dilemma between program evaluation and social science research. Although the article's implications are directed toward public health evaluators, they are generalizable to other evaluators in other disciplines. These obstacles highlight the fact that a major role of any evaluator is to confront and negotiate successfully around them.

摘要

本文提出了开展项目评估时面临的一些障碍,其中包括:“评估”这个词本身、评估的政治因素、资源不足、组织抵制变革的倾向以及对项目评估背景缺乏理解。这些障碍的背后是项目评估与社会科学研究之间长期存在的定义困境。尽管本文的观点是针对公共卫生评估人员的,但它们也适用于其他学科的评估人员。这些障碍凸显了一个事实,即任何评估人员的主要职责之一就是成功应对并协商解决这些障碍。

相似文献

1
Obstacles to conducting program evaluations: implications for public health evaluators.开展项目评估的障碍:对公共卫生评估人员的启示
J Health Soc Policy. 1996;8(1):91-101. doi: 10.1300/J045v08n01_08.
2
'How can I know what I think till I see what I say?' Evaluating health care structure.“我怎么知道自己在想什么,直到我看到自己说了什么?”评估医疗保健结构。
Aust Health Rev. 1992;15(3):248-58.
3
Methods for conducting systematic reviews of targeted vaccination strategies for the guide to community preventive services.为社区预防服务指南开展针对性疫苗接种策略系统评价的方法。
Am J Prev Med. 2005 Jun;28(5 Suppl):238-47. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.02.012.
4
A model research design to determine whether public programs providing health care for the poor and uninsured are successful.
J Health Soc Policy. 1992;3(3):85-92. doi: 10.1300/J045v03n03_06.
5
Barriers to patient involvement in health service planning and evaluation: an exploratory study.患者参与卫生服务规划与评估的障碍:一项探索性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Feb;70(2):234-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.09.009. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
6
Addressing the research-practice gap in healthcare management.弥合医疗保健管理领域的研究与实践差距。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008 Mar-Apr;14(2):155-9. doi: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000311894.57831.4b.
7
Tricks of the trade in community mental health research: working with mental health services and clients.社区心理健康研究的行业诀窍:与心理健康服务机构及客户合作
Eval Health Prof. 2009 Mar;32(1):38-58. doi: 10.1177/0163278708328738. Epub 2008 Dec 30.
8
Designing a framework for the evaluation of paediatric telepsychiatry: a participatory approach.设计儿科远程精神病学评估框架:一种参与式方法。
J Telemed Telecare. 2004;10(3):165-9. doi: 10.1258/135763304323070823.
9
Quasi-experimental evaluation without regression analysis.无回归分析的准实验评估
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2009 Mar-Apr;15(2):109-11. doi: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000346006.59275.1e.
10
Successful mechanisms for conducting evaluations of public/private partnerships.开展公私伙伴关系评估的成功机制。
Behav Healthc Tomorrow. 1997 Feb;6(1):33-7.