• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个人决策风格与长期护理选择。

Personal decisionmaking styles and long-term care choices.

作者信息

Maloney S K, Finn J, Bloom D L, Andresen J

机构信息

SPRY Foundation, Washington, DC 20006, USA.

出版信息

Health Care Financ Rev. 1996 Fall;18(1):141-55.

PMID:10165028
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4193628/
Abstract

To learn more about how older people make decisions about long-term care (LTC), in-depth interviews were conducted with 63 elderly individuals and 56 of their relatives to obtain information on the decisionmaking process. This qualitative research showed that LTC decisionmaking does not always follow typical consumer decisionmaking models, in which a consumer seeks a product or service, selects among the alternatives, and assesses the choice. Further, the interviews yielded four long-term care decisionmaking styles among older adults related to their degree of planning or not planning. This study underscores the need to develop tailored communications for older people and their families aimed at encouraging appropriate and cost-effective use of LTC services.

摘要

为了更深入了解老年人如何做出长期护理(LTC)决策,我们对63位老年人及其56位亲属进行了深度访谈,以获取决策过程的相关信息。这项定性研究表明,长期护理决策并不总是遵循典型的消费者决策模式,即消费者寻找产品或服务、在备选方案中进行选择并评估所选方案。此外,访谈还得出了老年人中与规划程度相关的四种长期护理决策风格。本研究强调需要为老年人及其家庭制定有针对性的沟通方式,以鼓励合理且经济高效地使用长期护理服务。

相似文献

1
Personal decisionmaking styles and long-term care choices.个人决策风格与长期护理选择。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1996 Fall;18(1):141-55.
2
A new long-term care manifesto.一份新的长期护理宣言。
Gerontologist. 2015 Apr;55(2):296-301. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv010. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
3
Determinants of first-time utilization of long-term care services in the Netherlands: an observational record linkage study.荷兰长期护理服务首次使用的决定因素:一项观察性记录链接研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Sep 5;17(1):626. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2570-z.
4
Cultural perspectives of older nursing home residents regarding signing their own DNR directives in Eastern Taiwan: a qualitative pilot study.台湾东部地区老年疗养院居民对签署自己的“不要复苏”指令的文化观点:一项定性试点研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 May 6;15:45. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0117-4.
5
Factors related to the decision-making for moving the older adults into long-term care facilities in Taiwan.与将老年人转移到台湾长期护理机构的决策相关的因素。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017 Sep;17(9):1319-1327. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12860. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
6
Program and policy issues affecting home and community-based long-term care use: findings from a qualitative study.影响家庭和社区长期护理使用的计划与政策问题:一项定性研究的结果
Home Health Care Serv Q. 2006;25(3-4):107-27. doi: 10.1300/J027v25n03_07.
7
Long-term care over an uncertain future: what can current retirees expect?在不确定的未来提供长期护理:当前的退休人员能期待什么?
Inquiry. 2005;42(4):335-50. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_42.4.335.
8
Patient centered long-term care.以患者为中心的长期护理。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1997 Winter;19(2):1-10.
9
The bottom line on assisted living.辅助生活的关键要点。
Hosp Health Netw. 1998 Jul 20;72(14):22-6.
10
Advance care planning in long-term care facilities.长期护理机构中的预立医疗照护计划
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2003 Mar-Apr;4(2):101-8. doi: 10.1097/01.JAM.0000052563.45932.FC.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing future care preparation in late life: Two short measures.评估晚年的未来护理准备:两个简短的措施。
Psychol Assess. 2017 Dec;29(12):1480-1495. doi: 10.1037/pas0000446. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
2
Optimism and Planning for Future Care Needs among Older Adults.老年人的乐观态度与对未来护理需求的规划
GeroPsych (Bern). 2014;27(1):5-22. doi: 10.1024/1662-9647/a000099.
3
The macular degeneration and aging study: Design and research protocol of a randomized trial for a psychosocial intervention with macular degeneration patients.黄斑变性与衰老研究:一项针对黄斑变性患者的社会心理干预随机试验的设计与研究方案
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 May;42:68-77. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
4
The relationship of preparation for future care to depression and anxiety in older primary care patients at 2-year follow-up.在两年后的随访中,为未来护理做准备与老年初级保健患者的抑郁和焦虑之间的关系。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;20(10):887-94. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e31822ccd8c.
5
How are personality traits related to preparation for future care needs in older adults?人格特质与老年人未来护理需求的准备情况有何关联?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2008 Nov;63(6):P328-36. doi: 10.1093/geronb/63.6.p328.
6
Preparation for future care needs: styles of preparation used by older Eastern German, United States, and Canadian women.为未来护理需求做准备:东德、美国和加拿大老年女性所采用的准备方式。
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2000;15(4):349-81. doi: 10.1023/a:1006778627518.
7
National and regional differences in preparation for future care needs: a comparison of the United States and Germany.国家和地区在未来护理需求准备方面的差异:美国与德国的比较。
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2003 Mar;18(1):53-78. doi: 10.1023/a:1024878512547.
8
Patient centered long-term care.以患者为中心的长期护理。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1997 Winter;19(2):1-10.

本文引用的文献

1
Health care spending in 1994: slowest in decades.1994年的医疗保健支出:几十年来最慢的。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1996 Summer;15(2):130-44. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.15.2.130.