• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药品平行贸易是否符合单一欧洲市场的要求?

Is parallel trade in medicines compatible with the single European market?

作者信息

Senior I

机构信息

REMIT Consultants, London, England.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 1992;1(Suppl 1):70-6. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199200011-00015.

DOI:10.2165/00019053-199200011-00015
PMID:10172047
Abstract

For many years the varying methods of price control of medicines by national governments in the European Community (and elsewhere) have resulted in wide variations in prices. Parallel traders buy products in low pricing Community countries and sell them, generally relabelled or repackaged, in high pricing Community countries. This practice diverts sales revenue and profits from the manufacturers to the traders, distributors, pharmacists and, in some measure, to the sickness funds and to some patients. While parallel trade appeals to those who gain financially, its basis is a market distortion that poses a significant threat to the future of the research-based pharmaceutical industry.

摘要

多年来,欧洲共同体(及其他地区)各国政府对药品价格的管控方式各不相同,导致了药品价格的大幅差异。平行进口商在共同体低价国家购买产品,然后通常重新贴标签或重新包装后在共同体高价国家销售。这种做法将销售收入和利润从制造商转移到了贸易商、经销商、药剂师手中,在一定程度上还转移到了疾病基金和一些患者手中。虽然平行进口对那些在经济上获利的人有吸引力,但其基础是市场扭曲,这对以研发为基础的制药行业的未来构成了重大威胁。

相似文献

1
Is parallel trade in medicines compatible with the single European market?药品平行贸易是否符合单一欧洲市场的要求?
Pharmacoeconomics. 1992;1(Suppl 1):70-6. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199200011-00015.
2
The economics of parallel trade.平行贸易的经济学
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Mar;13(3):293-304. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199813030-00004.
3
Parallel imports and the pricing of pharmaceutical products: evidence from the European Union.药品的平行进口与定价:来自欧盟的证据
J Health Econ. 2004 Sep;23(5):1035-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.03.005.
4
Pharmaceutical pricing, price controls, and their effects on pharmaceutical sales and research and development expenditures in the European Union.欧盟的药品定价、价格管制及其对药品销售以及研发支出的影响。
Clin Ther. 2004 Aug;26(8):1327-40; discussion 1326. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)80209-1.
5
Does reimportation reduce price differences for prescription drugs? Lessons from the European Union.药品再进口是否会缩小处方药的价格差异?来自欧盟的经验教训。
Health Serv Res. 2008 Aug;43(4):1308-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00838.x. Epub 2008 Mar 12.
6
The pros and cons of a single 'Euro-price' for drugs.药品单一“欧元价格”的利弊。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Mar;13(3):271-6. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199813030-00001.
7
Impact of parallel trade on pharmaceutical firm's profits: rise or fall?平行贸易对制药公司利润的影响:上升还是下降?
Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Apr;14(2):345-55. doi: 10.1007/s10198-012-0380-0.
8
[Risk sharing methods in middle income countries].[中等收入国家的风险分担方法]
Acta Pharm Hung. 2012;82(1):43-52.
9
Implication of external price referencing and parallel trade on pharmaceutical expenditure: indirect evidence from lower-income European countries.外部价格参考和平行贸易对药品支出的影响:来自低收入欧洲国家的间接证据。
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Apr 1;32(3):349-358. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw133.
10
[The drug trade between European countries and developing countries].[欧洲国家与发展中国家之间的毒品贸易]
Med Trop (Mars). 1997;57(4):375-9.

引用本文的文献

1
The pros and cons of a single 'Euro-price' for drugs.药品单一“欧元价格”的利弊。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Mar;13(3):271-6. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199813030-00001.