• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质量反馈:患者的手术护理体验

Feedback on quality: patients' experience of surgical care.

作者信息

Roberts E, Leavey R, Allen D, Gibbs G

机构信息

Manchester Health Authority.

出版信息

Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 1994;7(3):27-32. doi: 10.1108/09526869410059727.

DOI:10.1108/09526869410059727
PMID:10172103
Abstract

There is a growing consensus within the NHS of the importance of obtaining feedback from patients in order to improve the quality of health care; consequently, many patient satisfaction surveys are now undertaken. However, much research is based on provider-held assumptions about service quality. This study focuses on patient satisfaction with coronary bypass surgery, starting with the concerns expressed by patients and using these as a basis for evaluating different aspects of care. The paired comparison technique was employed to produce a ranked list of aspects of care that were perceived to be in greatest need of improvement. Some difficulties were encountered in administering the ranking technique to patients in a highly specialized health-care setting; however, results were obtained and validated for follow-up patients. The item of most concern to these patients was a lack of sensitivity about when patients felt ready for discharge.

摘要

英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)内部越来越一致地认为,为了提高医疗保健质量,从患者那里获得反馈非常重要;因此,现在开展了许多患者满意度调查。然而,许多研究是基于医疗服务提供者对服务质量的假设。本研究聚焦于患者对冠状动脉搭桥手术的满意度,从患者表达的担忧入手,并将这些担忧作为评估护理不同方面的基础。采用配对比较技术得出了一份护理方面的排名清单,这些方面被认为最需要改进。在高度专业化的医疗环境中对患者实施排名技术时遇到了一些困难;不过,还是获得了结果,并对后续患者进行了验证。这些患者最关心的问题是,在患者感觉准备好出院时缺乏敏感度。

相似文献

1
Feedback on quality: patients' experience of surgical care.质量反馈:患者的手术护理体验
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 1994;7(3):27-32. doi: 10.1108/09526869410059727.
2
Factors relating to patients' reports about hospital care for coronary heart disease in England.与英国患者关于冠心病住院治疗报告相关的因素。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003 Apr;8(2):83-6. doi: 10.1258/135581903321466049.
3
Health care quality in NHS hospitals.英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)医院的医疗质量。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 1996;9(1):15-28. doi: 10.1108/09526869610109125.
4
Some considerations for identifying quality measures of surgical outcome.确定手术结果质量指标的一些考量因素。
Health Serv Manage Res. 1994 Nov;7(4):265-70. doi: 10.1177/095148489400700406.
5
Getting satisfaction: drivers of surgical Hospital Consumer Assessment of Health care Providers and Systems survey scores.获得满意度:手术科室医疗服务提供者与系统消费者评估调查得分的驱动因素
J Surg Res. 2015 Jul;197(1):155-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.03.045. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
6
Factors associated with patient satisfaction in surgery: the role of patients' perceptions of received care, visit characteristics, and demographic variables.与手术患者满意度相关的因素:患者对所接受护理的感知、就诊特征和人口统计学变量的作用。
J Surg Res. 2010 Nov;164(1):e53-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.08.001. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
7
How to measure patient experience and outcomes to demonstrate quality in care.如何衡量患者体验和治疗结果以证明医疗质量。
Nurs Times. 2010;106(7):12-4.
8
Understanding patient reported outcome measures (PROMs).了解患者报告的结局指标(PROMs)。
Br J Community Nurs. 2011 Feb;16(2):80-2. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2011.16.2.80.
9
Is this satisfaction survey satisfactory? Some points to consider in their planning and assessment.这份满意度调查令人满意吗?在其规划和评估中需要考虑的一些要点。
Health Bull (Edinb). 2000 Jan;58(1):45-52.
10
Do quality report cards make a difference? The New York and Pennsylvania experience with releasing physician-specific outcomes.
Qual Lett Healthc Lead. 1993 Jul-Aug;5(6):2-11.