Varonen H, Mäkelä M
National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Qual Health Care. 1997 Jun;6(2):75-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.6.2.75.
To describe the quantity, quality, and availability of practice guidelines currently used in Finland.
Cross sectional survey.
Guidelines from 1989 to 1995 were collected through a database search, through hand searches of the two Finnish general medical journals, and through an inquiry into hospitals, health centres, and medical societies. The content and source of evidence for guidelines was assessed.
719 practice guidelines were found. 578 guidelines (80%) were retrieved by the inquiry, the database search identified 27 (4%) and hand searches 106 (15%). There were 150 guidelines (21%) developed nationally, 120 (17%) regionally, and 449 (62%) locally. The structure and quality of evidence supporting the guidelines was variable and only two guidelines were based on meta-analysis. The references were significantly more often (P < 0.001) documented in the national guidelines (n = 129, 86%) than in the regional or local guidelines (n = 65, 11%).
There are many ways of disseminating guidelines and it may be difficult for end users to find the appropriate guidelines. Sources of evidence were seldom documented in the regional and local guidelines and even some national guidelines lacked all references. More attention should be paid to documenting the level of evidence, structuring the guidelines, and creating optimal strategies for development and dissemination of guidelines.
描述芬兰目前使用的实践指南的数量、质量和可得性。
横断面调查。
通过数据库检索、手工检索两份芬兰普通医学期刊以及向医院、健康中心和医学协会进行询问,收集1989年至1995年的指南。对指南的证据内容和来源进行评估。
共找到719份实践指南。通过询问检索到578份指南(80%),数据库检索识别出27份(4%),手工检索识别出106份(15%)。有150份指南(21%)是全国制定的,120份(17%)是地区性的,449份(62%)是地方性的。支持这些指南的证据结构和质量各不相同,只有两份指南基于荟萃分析。全国性指南(n = 129,86%)中参考文献的记录明显多于地区性或地方性指南(n = 65,11%)(P < 0.001)。
指南的传播方式多种多样,终端用户可能难以找到合适的指南。地区性和地方性指南很少记录证据来源,甚至一些全国性指南也缺乏所有参考文献。应更加重视记录证据水平、构建指南以及制定指南制定和传播的最佳策略。