Wilkinson P R, Wolfe C D, Warburton F G, Rudd A G, Howard R S, Ross-Russell R W, Beech R
St Thomas's Hospital, London.
Qual Health Care. 1997 Sep;6(3):125-30. doi: 10.1136/qshc.6.3.125.
To consider whether the Barthel Index alone provides sufficient information about the long term outcome of stroke.
Cross sectional follow up study with a structured interview questionnaire and measures of impairment, disability, handicap, and general health. The scales used were the hospital anxiety and depression scale, mini mental state examination, Barthel index, modified Rankin scale, London handicap scale, Frenchay activities index, SF36, Nottingham health profile, life satisfaction index, and the caregiver strain index.
South east London.
People, and their identified carers, resident in south east London in 1989-90 when they had their first in a life-time stroke aged under 75 years.
Observational study.
Comparison and correlation of the individual Barthel index scores with the scores on other outcome measures.
One hundred and twenty three (42%) people were known to be alive, of whom 106 (86%) were interviewed. The median age was 71 years (range 34-79). The mean interval between the stroke and follow up was 4.9 years. The rank correlation coefficients between the Barthel and the different dimensions of the SF36 ranged from r = 0.217 (with the role emotional dimension) to r = 0.810 (with the physical functioning dimension); with the Nottingham health profile the range was r = -0.189 (with the sleep dimension, NS) to r = -0.840 (with the physical mobility dimension); with the hospital and anxiety scale depression component the coefficient was r = -0.563, with the life satisfaction index r = 0.361, with the London handicap scale r = 0.726 and with the Frenchay activities index r = 0.826.
The place of the Barthel index as the standard outcome measure for populations of stroke patients is still justified for long term follow up, and may be a proxy for different outcome measures intended for the assessment of other domains.
探讨仅使用巴氏指数是否能提供关于中风长期预后的充分信息。
采用结构化访谈问卷及对损伤、残疾、残障和一般健康状况进行测量的横断面随访研究。所使用的量表包括医院焦虑抑郁量表、简易精神状态检查表、巴氏指数、改良Rankin量表、伦敦残障量表、Frenchay活动指数、SF36、诺丁汉健康概况量表、生活满意度指数和照顾者压力指数。
伦敦东南部。
1989 - 1990年期间居住在伦敦东南部、首次发生一生中年龄在75岁以下中风的患者及其确定的照顾者。
观察性研究。
个体巴氏指数得分与其他预后指标得分的比较及相关性。
已知123人(42%)存活,其中106人(86%)接受了访谈。中位年龄为71岁(范围34 - 79岁)。中风与随访之间的平均间隔为4.9年。巴氏指数与SF36不同维度之间的等级相关系数范围为r = 0.217(与角色情感维度)至r = 0.810(与身体功能维度);与诺丁汉健康概况量表的范围为r = -0.189(与睡眠维度,无显著性差异)至r = -0.840(与身体活动能力维度);与医院焦虑量表抑郁分量的系数为r = -0.563,与生活满意度指数r = 0.361,与伦敦残障量表r = 0.726,与Frenchay活动指数r = 0.826。
巴氏指数作为中风患者群体标准预后指标的地位在长期随访中仍然合理,并且可能是用于评估其他领域的不同预后指标的替代指标。