• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大规模定制的四个方面。

The four faces of mass customization.

作者信息

Gilmore J H, Pine B J

机构信息

Strategic Horizons, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

Harv Bus Rev. 1997 Jan-Feb;75(1):91-101.

PMID:10174455
Abstract

Virtually all executives today recognize the need to provide outstanding service to customers. Focusing on the customer, however, is both an imperative and a potential curse. In their desire to become customer driven, many companies have resorted to inventing new programs and procedures to meet every customer's request. But as customers and their needs grow increasingly diverse, such an approach has become a surefire way to add unnecessary cost and complexity to operations. Companies around the world have embraced mass customization in an attempt to avoid those pitfalls. Readily available information technology and flexible work processes permit them to customize goods or services for individual customers in high volumes at low cost. But many managers have discovered that mass customization itself can produce unnecessary cost and complexity. They are realizing that they did not examine thoroughly enough what kind of customization their customers would value before they plunged ahead. That is understandable. Until now, no framework has existed to help managers determine the type of customization they should pursue. James Gilmore and Joseph Pine provide managers with just such a framework. They have identified four distinct approaches to customization. When designing or redesigning a product, process, or business unit, managers should examine each approach for possible insights into how to serve their customers best. In some cases, a single approach will dominate the design. More often, however, managers will need a mix of some or all of the four approaches to serve their own particular set of customers.

摘要

如今,几乎所有高管都认识到有必要为客户提供卓越的服务。然而,专注于客户既是一种必要之举,也可能是一种潜在的祸根。在渴望成为以客户为导向的过程中,许多公司采取了发明新计划和程序的方式来满足每一位客户的要求。但随着客户及其需求日益多样化,这种方法已成为一种必然会给运营增加不必要成本和复杂性的方式。世界各地的公司都采用了大规模定制,试图避免这些陷阱。现成的信息技术和灵活的工作流程使它们能够以低成本为大量个人客户定制商品或服务。但许多经理发现,大规模定制本身也会产生不必要的成本和复杂性。他们意识到,在贸然行动之前,他们没有充分审视客户会看重哪种类型的定制。这是可以理解的。到目前为止,还没有一个框架可以帮助经理们确定他们应该追求的定制类型。詹姆斯·吉尔摩和约瑟夫·派恩为经理们提供了这样一个框架。他们确定了四种不同的定制方法。在设计或重新设计产品、流程或业务部门时,经理们应该审视每种方法,以获得关于如何最好地服务客户的可能见解。在某些情况下,单一方法将主导设计。然而,更常见的情况是,经理们需要结合使用这四种方法中的一些或全部来服务他们自己特定的客户群体。

相似文献

1
The four faces of mass customization.大规模定制的四个方面。
Harv Bus Rev. 1997 Jan-Feb;75(1):91-101.
2
Is your company ready for one-to-one marketing?你的公司准备好开展一对一营销了吗?
Harv Bus Rev. 1999 Jan-Feb;77(1):151-60.
3
Loyalty-based management.基于忠诚度的管理。
Harv Bus Rev. 1993 Mar-Apr;71(2):64-73.
4
Making business sense of the Internet.从商业角度理解互联网。
Harv Bus Rev. 1998 Mar-Apr;76(2):126-35.
5
Customer value & business success in the 21st century.21世纪的客户价值与商业成功。
Manag Care Q. 2000 Spring;8(2):11-21.
6
Build loyalty in business markets.在商业市场中建立忠诚度。
Harv Bus Rev. 2005 Sep;83(9):131-9, 160.
7
Tailored logistics: the next advantage.定制物流:下一个优势。
Harv Bus Rev. 1993 May-Jun;71(3):87-98.
8
Best face forward.展现最美的一面。
Harv Bus Rev. 2004 Dec;82(12):47-52, 54-8, 147.
9
Smart customers, dumb companies.精明的顾客,愚蠢的公司。
Harv Bus Rev. 2000 Nov-Dec;78(6):187-91.
10
Contextual marketing--the real business of the Internet.情境营销——互联网的真正业务。
Harv Bus Rev. 2000 Nov-Dec;78(6):119-25.

引用本文的文献

1
How multisensory perception promotes purchase intent in the context of clothing e-customisation.在服装电子定制背景下,多感官感知如何促进购买意愿。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 23;13:1039875. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1039875. eCollection 2022.
2
Development of a valid and reliable software customization model for SaaS quality through iterative method: perspectives from academia.通过迭代方法开发用于软件即服务(SaaS)质量的有效且可靠的软件定制模型:来自学术界的观点
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2020 Sep 21;6:e294. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.294. eCollection 2020.
3
On services research and education.
关于服务研究与教育。
J Syst Sci Syst Eng. 2006;15(3):257-283. doi: 10.1007/s11518-006-5019-1.
4
(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare.(再)铺普罗克汝斯忒斯之床?标准化与定制化在医疗保健领域的竞争逻辑
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Jun 1;6(6):301-304. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.35.
5
Age Differences in Consumer Decision Making under Option Framing: From the Motivation Perspective.选项框架下消费者决策中的年龄差异:基于动机视角
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 7;7:1736. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01736. eCollection 2016.