• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过迭代方法开发用于软件即服务(SaaS)质量的有效且可靠的软件定制模型:来自学术界的观点

Development of a valid and reliable software customization model for SaaS quality through iterative method: perspectives from academia.

作者信息

Ali Abdulrazzaq Qasem, Md Sultan Abu Bakar, Abd Ghani Abdul Azim, Zulzalil Hazura

机构信息

Department of Software Engineering and Information System, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.

出版信息

PeerJ Comput Sci. 2020 Sep 21;6:e294. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.294. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.7717/peerj-cs.294
PMID:33816945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7924678/
Abstract

Despite the benefits of standardization, the customization of Software as a Service (SaaS) application is also essential because of the many unique requirements of customers. This study, therefore, focuses on the development of a valid and reliable software customization model for SaaS quality that consists of (1) generic software customization types and a list of common practices for each customization type in the SaaS multi-tenant context, and (2) key quality attributes of SaaS applications associated with customization. The study was divided into three phases: the conceptualization of the model, analysis of its validity using SaaS academic-derived expertise, and evaluation of its reliability by submitting it to an internal consistency reliability test conducted by software-engineer researchers. The model was initially devised based on six customization approaches, 46 customization practices, and 13 quality attributes in the SaaS multi-tenant context. Subsequently, its content was validated over two rounds of testing after which one approach and 14 practices were removed and 20 practices were reformulated. The internal consistency reliability study was thereafter conducted by 34 software engineer researchers. All constructs of the content-validated model were found to be reliable in this study. The final version of the model consists of 6 constructs and 44 items. These six constructs and their associated items are as follows: (1) Configuration (eight items), (2) Composition (four items), (3) Extension (six items), 4) Integration (eight items), (5) Modification (five items), and (6) SaaS quality (13 items). The results of the study may contribute to enhancing the capability of empirically analyzing the impact of software customization on SaaS quality by benefiting from all resultant constructs and items.

摘要

尽管标准化有诸多益处,但由于客户有许多独特需求,软件即服务(SaaS)应用的定制也至关重要。因此,本研究聚焦于开发一个针对SaaS质量的有效且可靠的软件定制模型,该模型包括:(1)通用软件定制类型以及SaaS多租户环境中每种定制类型的常见实践列表;(2)与定制相关的SaaS应用的关键质量属性。该研究分为三个阶段:模型的概念化、利用源自SaaS学术领域的专业知识分析其有效性,以及通过将其提交给软件工程师研究人员进行的内部一致性可靠性测试来评估其可靠性。该模型最初基于SaaS多租户环境中的六种定制方法、46种定制实践和13个质量属性设计而成。随后,经过两轮测试对其内容进行了验证,之后删除了一种方法和14种实践,并重新制定了20种实践。此后,34名软件工程师研究人员进行了内部一致性可靠性研究。在本研究中,经内容验证的模型的所有构建均被发现是可靠的。该模型的最终版本由6个构建和44个项目组成。这六个构建及其相关项目如下:(1)配置(8个项目)、(2)组合(4个项目)、(3)扩展(6个项目)、(4)集成(8个项目)、(5)修改(5个项目)以及(6)SaaS质量(13个项目)。该研究结果可能有助于通过利用所有最终构建和项目来提高实证分析软件定制对SaaS质量影响的能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c4f/7924678/579c100791ee/peerj-cs-06-294-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c4f/7924678/e5f8e56b223f/peerj-cs-06-294-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c4f/7924678/0f065e4a0eb9/peerj-cs-06-294-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c4f/7924678/c45f24042c8d/peerj-cs-06-294-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c4f/7924678/9e725d3ddb97/peerj-cs-06-294-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c4f/7924678/333b7f74aedd/peerj-cs-06-294-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c4f/7924678/579c100791ee/peerj-cs-06-294-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c4f/7924678/e5f8e56b223f/peerj-cs-06-294-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c4f/7924678/0f065e4a0eb9/peerj-cs-06-294-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c4f/7924678/c45f24042c8d/peerj-cs-06-294-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c4f/7924678/9e725d3ddb97/peerj-cs-06-294-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c4f/7924678/333b7f74aedd/peerj-cs-06-294-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c4f/7924678/579c100791ee/peerj-cs-06-294-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a valid and reliable software customization model for SaaS quality through iterative method: perspectives from academia.通过迭代方法开发用于软件即服务(SaaS)质量的有效且可靠的软件定制模型:来自学术界的观点
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2020 Sep 21;6:e294. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.294. eCollection 2020.
2
TOSDS: Tenant-centric Object-based Software Defined Storage for Multitenant SaaS Applications.TOSDS:面向多租户SaaS应用的以租户为中心的基于对象的软件定义存储
Arab J Sci Eng. 2021;46(9):9221-9235. doi: 10.1007/s13369-021-05743-z. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
3
A New Tool for Nutrition App Quality Evaluation (AQEL): Development, Validation, and Reliability Testing.一种用于营养应用程序质量评估(AQEL)的新工具:开发、验证和可靠性测试。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Oct 27;5(10):e163. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7441.
4
Shortening patient-reported outcome measures through optimal test assembly: application to the Social Appearance Anxiety Scale in the Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network Cohort.通过最优测试组合缩短患者报告的结局测量:在硬皮病患者为中心的干预网络队列中的社会外貌焦虑量表中的应用。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 22;9(2):e024010. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024010.
5
Development of a patient-reported outcome measure for psychotherapeutic interventions in people with seizures: A mixed methods study.开发一种针对癫痫患者心理治疗干预的患者报告结局测量工具:混合方法研究。
Epilepsy Behav. 2019 Oct;99:106464. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106464. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
6
Validation of the Social Appearance Anxiety Scale in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis: A Scleroderma Patient-Centered Intervention Network Cohort Study.系统性硬化症患者社会外表焦虑量表的验证:硬皮病患者为中心干预网络队列研究。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Oct;70(10):1557-1562. doi: 10.1002/acr.23514.
7
Architecture Design of Healthcare Software-as-a-Service Platform for Cloud-Based Clinical Decision Support Service.用于基于云的临床决策支持服务的医疗软件即服务平台的架构设计。
Healthc Inform Res. 2015 Apr;21(2):102-10. doi: 10.4258/hir.2015.21.2.102. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
8
A Modular Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument for Electronic Assessment and Treatment Monitoring: Web-Based Development and Psychometric Validation of Core Thrive Items.一种用于电子评估和治疗监测的模块化健康相关生活质量工具:基于网络的核心Thrive项目开发及心理测量学验证
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 25;21(1):e12075. doi: 10.2196/12075.
9
Initial development and psychometric testing of an instrument to measure the quality of children's end-of-life care.一种用于衡量儿童临终关怀质量的工具的初步开发及心理测量测试。
BMC Palliat Care. 2015 Jan 13;14(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-14-1. eCollection 2015.
10
Development and Validity Testing of an Arthritis Self-Management Assessment Tool.一种关节炎自我管理评估工具的开发与效度测试
Orthop Nurs. 2018 Jan/Feb;37(1):24-35. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000415.

引用本文的文献

1
A new SLA-aware method for discovering the cloud services using an improved nature-inspired optimization algorithm.一种使用改进的自然启发式优化算法来发现云服务的新型感知服务水平协议方法。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2021 May 10;7:e539. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.539. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Consensus among healthcare stakeholders on a collaborative medication therapy management model for chronic diseases in Malaysia; A Delphi study.马来西亚医疗利益相关者对慢性病协作药物治疗管理模式的共识;一项德尔菲研究。
PLoS One. 2019 May 10;14(5):e0216563. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216563. eCollection 2019.
2
Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool: a modified e-Delphi study.提升混合方法评价工具的内容效度:一项改良版的电子德尔菲研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jul;111:49-59.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.03.008. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
3
Developing an instrument to measure emotional behaviour abilities of meaningful learning through the Delphi technique.
运用德尔菲技术开发测量有意义学习的情绪行为能力的工具。
J Adv Nurs. 2017 Sep;73(9):2208-2218. doi: 10.1111/jan.13273. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
4
Expert validation of a teamwork assessment rubric: A modified Delphi study.团队合作评估量表的专家验证:一项改良的德尔菲研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Jan;36:77-85. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.07.023. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
5
Design and Implementation Content Validity Study: Development of an instrument for measuring Patient-Centered Communication.设计与实施内容效度研究:开发一种用于测量以患者为中心的沟通的工具。
J Caring Sci. 2015 Jun 1;4(2):165-78. doi: 10.15171/jcs.2015.017. eCollection 2015 Jun.
6
Validating the personal health records adoption model using a modified e-Delphi.采用改良型电子德尔菲法验证个人健康记录采用模式。
J Adv Nurs. 2013 Mar;69(3):685-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06056.x. Epub 2012 Jun 10.
7
Development of an evidence-based protocol for care of pilonidal sinus wounds healing by secondary intent using a modified reactive Delphi procedure. Part one: the literature review*.基于证据的方案制定:采用改良反应性 Delphi 程序,促进二期愈合的藏毛窦伤口护理。第一部分:文献回顾*。
Int Wound J. 2012 Apr;9(2):156-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00874.x. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
8
Content validity of a process evaluation checklist to measure intervention implementation fidelity of the EPIC intervention.EPIC 干预措施实施保真度的过程评估检查表的内容效度。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2010 Sep;7(3):158-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2010.00182.x. Epub 2010 Feb 18.
9
The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations.内容效度指数:你确定你知道所报告的内容吗?评论与建议。
Res Nurs Health. 2006 Oct;29(5):489-97. doi: 10.1002/nur.20147.
10
Identification of pain indicators for infants at risk for neurological impairment: a Delphi consensus study.识别有神经功能障碍风险婴儿的疼痛指标:德尔菲共识研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2006 Feb 2;6:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-6-1.