Zincone L H, Doty E, Balch D C
Department of Decision Science, School of Business, East Carolina University School of Medicine, Greenville, NC, USA.
Telemed J. 1997 Winter;3(4):247-55. doi: 10.1089/tmj.1.1997.3.247.
To quantify the costs and benefits of medical care under a telemedicine agreement.
Two telemedicine contracts between the North Carolina Central Prison (NCCP) and the East Carolina University School of Medicine were analyzed, first from the point of view of the prison using break-even analysis and second from the societal point of view examining whether the arrangements were positive for the taxpayers of North Carolina.
While the prison system never broke even with the first contract, the break-even was attainable, as it would have required an average of only one consultation per day. The prison system attained break-even status in the latest year of the second contract, and simple forecasts indicate a good chance that usage will grow beyond the break-even point. From the societal point of view, the contracts are merely transfers of funds from one state agency to another. Therefore, the differences in them are irrelevant. What is relevant is a measure of average fixed and variable spending for telemedicine and what this expenditure buys in terms of avoided costs. Thus, we examined the average full cost per visit, as determined from the actual or estimated expenditures, and concluded that the program paid back its cost during year 4.
量化远程医疗协议下医疗护理的成本与效益。
分析了北卡罗来纳州中央监狱(NCCP)与东卡罗来纳大学医学院之间的两份远程医疗合同,首先从监狱的角度使用盈亏平衡分析,其次从社会的角度考察这些安排对北卡罗来纳州纳税人是否有利。
虽然监狱系统在第一份合同中从未实现收支平衡,但收支平衡是可以实现的,因为平均每天只需一次会诊即可。监狱系统在第二份合同的最后一年达到了收支平衡状态,简单的预测表明使用量很有可能增长到收支平衡点以上。从社会的角度来看,这些合同只是资金从一个州机构转移到另一个州机构。因此,它们之间的差异无关紧要。相关的是远程医疗的平均固定和可变支出的衡量标准,以及这笔支出在避免成本方面所带来的收益。因此,我们根据实际或估计支出确定了每次就诊的平均总成本,并得出该项目在第4年收回成本的结论。