• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子病历中的安全性与保密性。

Security and confidentiality in an electronic medical record.

作者信息

Olson L A, Peters S G, Stewart J B

机构信息

Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

Healthc Inf Manage. 1998 Spring;12(1):27-37.

PMID:10179264
Abstract

The maintenance of privacy and confidentially must remain a core principle of the interaction between patients and medical staff. Traditionally, the single paper copy of the medical history has been treated with systematic handling, careful tracking, and respect for the integrity and confidentiality of the contents. The widespread availability of computerized information requires that these principles be maintained in the electronic environment. Security measures should protect sensitive data without hindering medical practice. At Mayo, we have established data security policies and standards for the handling of all electronic information. Dissemination and communication of these standards and guidelines are an ongoing challenge. Technical maneuvers can be employed to protect data integrity, identify users, and monitor compliance. Personnel policies must be updated to reflect the responsibilities and liabilities of the electronic environment. Practice efficiencies and access to clinical data must be balanced by individual responsibility and accountability for privileged patient information.

摘要

维护隐私和保密必须始终是患者与医护人员互动的核心原则。传统上,病史的单一纸质副本一直受到系统处理、仔细跟踪,并尊重其内容的完整性和保密性。计算机化信息的广泛应用要求在电子环境中维护这些原则。安全措施应保护敏感数据,同时不妨碍医疗实践。在梅奥诊所,我们已经制定了处理所有电子信息的数据安全政策和标准。传播和宣传这些标准和指南是一项持续的挑战。可以采用技术手段来保护数据完整性、识别用户并监控合规情况。人事政策必须更新,以反映电子环境中的责任和义务。实践效率和临床数据访问必须与对患者特权信息的个人责任和问责制相平衡。

相似文献

1
Security and confidentiality in an electronic medical record.电子病历中的安全性与保密性。
Healthc Inf Manage. 1998 Spring;12(1):27-37.
2
Information technologies need to protect patient confidentiality.信息技术需要保护患者的隐私。
Healthc Financ Manage. 1998 Oct;52(10):66-8.
3
Legal issues of the electronic dental record: security and confidentiality.电子牙科记录的法律问题:安全性与保密性。
J Dent Educ. 1996 Jan;60(1):19-23.
4
Final HIPAA security regulations: a review.《健康保险流通与责任法案》最终安全法规:综述
Manag Care Q. 2003 Summer;11(3):15-27.
5
Security requirements for electronic patients records: the Norwegian view.电子病历的安全要求:挪威的观点。
Int J Biomed Comput. 1994 Feb;35 Suppl:51-6.
6
Protecting patients' privacy. Health information networks raise new questions.保护患者隐私。健康信息网络引发了新问题。
Health Prog. 1998 May-Jun;79(3):26-31.
7
Access and privacy rights using web security standards to increase patient empowerment.利用网络安全标准保障访问和隐私权,增强患者自主权。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;137:275-85.
8
American Academy of Pediatrics. Pediatric Practice Action Group and Task Force on Medical Informatics. Privacy protection and health information: patient rights and pediatrician responsibilities.美国儿科学会。儿科实践行动小组及医学信息学特别工作组。隐私保护与健康信息:患者权利与儿科医生职责。
Pediatrics. 1999 Oct;104(4 Pt 1):973-7.
9
Privacy and security compliance in the E-healthcare marketplace.电子医疗市场中的隐私与安全合规
Healthc Financ Manage. 2000 Mar;54(3):48-50.
10
Legal review: protecting the confidentiality and integrity of patient records.法律审查:保护患者记录的保密性和完整性。
Top Health Inf Manage. 1997 May;17(4):62-71.

引用本文的文献

1
A proposal for electronic medical records in U.S. primary care.美国初级保健中电子病历的一项提议。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Jan-Feb;10(1):1-10. doi: 10.1197/jamia.m1097.
2
The quality case for information technology in healthcare.医疗保健领域信息技术的质量案例。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2002 Oct 23;2:7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-2-7.