Salkever D S, German P S, Shapiro S, Horky R, Skinner E A
Health Serv Res. 1976 Fall;11(3):252-70.
Using data from a 1974 household survey, accessibility to ambulatory care is compared for residents of an inner-city area (East Baltimore) whose usual source of care is an HMO (the East Baltimore Medical Plan) and residents of the same area with other usual sources of care. Accessibility is measured by the probability of receiving care for an episode of illness. Results from multivariate linear and probit regressions indicate that children using the HMO are more likely to receive care than are children with other usual care sources, but no significant differences in the probability of receiving care are found among adults. Evidence of a substitution of telephone care for in-person care is also found among persons using the HMO. Data from a 1971 household survey of the same area suggest that selectivity is not an important confounding factor in the analysis.
利用1974年家庭调查的数据,对市中心区(东巴尔的摩)以健康维护组织(东巴尔的摩医疗计划)为常规医疗服务来源的居民与同一地区有其他常规医疗服务来源的居民的门诊医疗可及性进行了比较。可及性通过疾病发作时接受治疗的概率来衡量。多元线性回归和概率单位回归的结果表明,使用健康维护组织的儿童比有其他常规医疗服务来源的儿童更有可能接受治疗,但在成年人接受治疗的概率方面未发现显著差异。在使用健康维护组织的人群中还发现了用电话护理替代面对面护理的证据。同一地区1971年家庭调查的数据表明,选择性在分析中不是一个重要的混杂因素。