• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A Monte Carlo study of alternative responses to intraclass correlation in community trials. Is it ever possible to avoid Cornfield's penalties?

作者信息

Murray D M, Hannan P J, Baker W L

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Eval Rev. 1996 Jun;20(3):313-37. doi: 10.1177/0193841X9602000305.

DOI:10.1177/0193841X9602000305
PMID:10182207
Abstract

Strategies to avoid the penalties of extra variation and reduced degrees of freedom in community trials were compared in Monte Carlo simulations. Three conditions were found necessary to ensure nominal Type I and II error rates: (a) Condition variation must be assessed against assignment unit variation, (b) the critical value for the test statistic must be based on the assignment unit degrees of freedom, and (c) estimation of negative intraclass correlations must be allowed in the analysis. Using other test statistics and other degrees of freedom, and fixing negative intraclass correlations at zero often gave Type I and II error rates far from their nominal levels.

摘要

相似文献

1
A Monte Carlo study of alternative responses to intraclass correlation in community trials. Is it ever possible to avoid Cornfield's penalties?
Eval Rev. 1996 Jun;20(3):313-37. doi: 10.1177/0193841X9602000305.
2
Gauss or Bernoulli? A Monte Carlo comparison of the performance of the linear mixed-model and the logistic mixed-model analyses in simulated community trials with a dichotomous outcome variable at the individual level.高斯模型还是伯努利模型?在个体水平上具有二分结果变量的模拟社区试验中,线性混合模型和逻辑混合模型分析性能的蒙特卡罗比较
Eval Rev. 1996 Jun;20(3):338-52. doi: 10.1177/0193841X9602000306.
3
Batch sampling to improve power in a community trial. Experience from the Pawtucket Heart Health Program.
Eval Rev. 1996 Jun;20(3):244-74. doi: 10.1177/0193841X9602000302.
4
Comparing dependent correlations.比较相关依存关系。
J Gen Psychol. 2008 Jan;135(1):105-12. doi: 10.3200/GENP.135.1.105-112.
5
Hypothesis tests for population heterogeneity in meta-analysis.荟萃分析中总体异质性的假设检验。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2007 May;60(Pt 1):29-60. doi: 10.1348/000711005X64042.
6
Estimation of reliability in a three-factor model.三因素模型中的可靠性估计。
Stat Med. 2011 May 20;30(11):1254-65. doi: 10.1002/sim.4182. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
7
Analysis of variations in mortality rates with small numbers.小数量死亡率变化分析
Health Serv Res. 1994 Oct;29(4):461-71.
8
Reducing Monte Carlo error in the Bayesian estimation of risk ratios using log-binomial regression models.使用对数二项回归模型减少贝叶斯风险比估计中的蒙特卡罗误差。
Stat Med. 2015 Aug 30;34(19):2755-67. doi: 10.1002/sim.6527. Epub 2015 May 5.
9
Analysis approaches to community evaluation.
Eval Rev. 1997 Apr;21(2):209-30. doi: 10.1177/0193841X9702100205.
10
Ezekiel's classic estimator of the population squared multiple correlation coefficient: Monte Carlo-based extensions and refinements.以撒·埃兹凯厄尔经典的群体平方复相关系数估计量:基于蒙特卡罗的扩展和改进。
J Gen Psychol. 2020 Jul-Sep;147(3):213-227. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2019.1679080. Epub 2019 Oct 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementing remote patient monitoring to improve hypertension control in a primary care network: Rationale and design of the monitor-BP Cluster Randomized Trial.在初级保健网络中实施远程患者监测以改善高血压控制:Monitor-BP 整群随机试验的原理与设计
Am Heart J. 2025 Oct;288:52-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2025.04.005. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
2
Analysis of multiple-period group randomized trials: random coefficients model or repeated measures ANOVA?多周期群组随机试验分析:随机系数模型还是重复测量方差分析?
Trials. 2022 Dec 7;23(1):987. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06917-2.
3
Test-retest reliability of brain responses to risk-taking during the balloon analogue risk task.
在气球模拟风险任务中,冒险行为的大脑反应的重测信度。
Neuroimage. 2020 Apr 1;209:116495. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116495. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
4
Peer mentor versus teacher delivery of a physical activity program on the effects of BMI and daily activity: protocol of a school-based group randomized controlled trial in Appalachia.同伴导师与教师在身体活动计划对 BMI 和日常活动影响方面的效果比较:阿巴拉契亚地区基于学校的群组随机对照试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2018 May 16;18(1):633. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5537-z.
5
Design and analysis of group-randomized trials in cancer: A review of current practices.癌症中群组随机试验的设计与分析:现行实践述评。
Prev Med. 2018 Jun;111:241-247. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.03.010. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
6
Effective Recruitment of Schools for Randomized Clinical Trials: Role of School Nurses.为随机临床试验有效招募学校:学校护士的作用。
J Sch Nurs. 2018 Dec;34(6):430-434. doi: 10.1177/1059840517717592. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
7
Review of Recent Methodological Developments in Group-Randomized Trials: Part 1-Design.群组随机试验近期方法学进展综述:第1部分——设计
Am J Public Health. 2017 Jun;107(6):907-915. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303706. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
8
Statistical lessons learned for designing cluster randomized pragmatic clinical trials from the NIH Health Care Systems Collaboratory Biostatistics and Design Core.从美国国立卫生研究院医疗保健系统合作实验室生物统计学与设计核心部门获取的关于设计整群随机实用临床试验的统计学经验教训。
Clin Trials. 2016 Oct;13(5):504-12. doi: 10.1177/1740774516646578. Epub 2016 May 13.
9
Recommendations for choosing an analysis method that controls Type I error for unbalanced cluster sample designs with Gaussian outcomes.关于为具有高斯分布结果的不平衡整群抽样设计选择控制第一类错误的分析方法的建议。
Stat Med. 2015 Nov 30;34(27):3531-45. doi: 10.1002/sim.6565. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
10
Childhood Obesity Research Demonstration project: cross-site evaluation methods.儿童肥胖研究示范项目:跨站点评估方法
Child Obes. 2015 Feb;11(1):92-103. doi: 10.1089/chi.2014.0061.