• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

异化与管理。系统重组通常需要四种典型行为。

Alienation and administration. System restructuring often entails four types of canonical acts.

作者信息

Morrisey F G

机构信息

Faculty of Canon Law, Saint Paul University, Ottawa.

出版信息

Health Prog. 1998 Sep-Oct;79(5):24-9.

PMID:10187515
Abstract

When applying canon law to healthcare transactions, difficulties often arise in determining whether the transaction or restructuring in question constitutes a canonical act of alienation or an act of administration. Changes in system governance may leave local property titles untouched, suggesting that no alienation has taken place, but loss of Catholic identity or a reduced ability to carry out the Church's mission may indeed constitute alienation. Often in restructurings, four types of canonical acts are involved: alienation of property (alienation in the strict sense), acts that can jeopardize the stable patrimony (sometimes called alienation in the broad sense), acts of ordinary administration, and acts of extraordinary administration. While alienation concerns the divestiture of ownership, the general purpose of administration is to preserve goods. Acts of extraordinary administration require certain formalities of consent before they can be carried out. However, the intervention of the Holy See is not required, as it is for acts of alienation. The permission may be granted in principle, before a formal offer is received; after an offer is received; or, in some cases, by a "blanket" indult. A restructuring can amount to an alienation unless care is taken to verify to maintain certain reserved powers, thus ensuring that the work is still under the direction or canonical control of the sponsoring religious institute or diocese. Joint ventures, however, seldom involve insoluble canonical problems. Each situation must be evaluated individually and care taken to ensure that the requirements of both eccleslastical and secular law are met.

摘要

在将教会法应用于医疗保健交易时,在确定所讨论的交易或重组是构成教会法上的转让行为还是管理行为时,往往会出现困难。系统治理的变化可能不会触动当地的财产所有权,这表明没有发生转让,但天主教身份的丧失或执行教会使命能力的下降可能确实构成转让。在重组中,通常涉及四种教会法行为:财产转让(严格意义上的转让)、可能危及稳定遗产的行为(有时称为广义上的转让)、普通管理行为和特别管理行为。虽然转让涉及所有权的剥离,但管理的一般目的是保护财产。特别管理行为在实施前需要一定的同意手续。然而,与转让行为不同,特别管理行为不需要罗马教廷的干预。许可原则上可以在收到正式报价之前、收到报价之后或在某些情况下通过“全面”特许授予。除非注意核实保留某些权力,以确保工作仍在主办宗教机构或教区的指导或教会法控制之下,否则重组可能构成转让。然而,合资企业很少涉及无法解决的教会法问题。每种情况都必须单独评估,并注意确保同时符合教会法和世俗法的要求。

相似文献

1
Alienation and administration. System restructuring often entails four types of canonical acts.异化与管理。系统重组通常需要四种典型行为。
Health Prog. 1998 Sep-Oct;79(5):24-9.
2
Canonical considerations in corporate restructuring.企业重组中的规范考量。
Health Prog. 1985 Mar;66(2):36-9, 46.
3
Does Canon Law speak of sponsorship of Catholic works?
Health Prog. 2007 Jan-Feb;88(1):29-30, 68.
4
Preserving Catholic identity in mergers--an ethical and Canon Law perspective.在合并中保持天主教身份——伦理与教会法视角
Health Prog. 1992 Mar;73(2):28-33.
5
Church law's role in collaborations. Principles to guide Catholic healthcare providers contemplating new arrangements.
Health Prog. 1993 Nov;74(9):24-9.
6
Canonical duties, liabilities of trustees and administrators.规范职责、受托人和管理人的责任。
Health Prog. 1985 Jun;66(5):47-51, 70.
7
Evolving sponsorship and corporate structures. Canon law considerations for changing organizations.不断演变的赞助与公司结构。教会法对组织变革的考量。
Health Prog. 1995 Jul-Aug;76(6):35-42.
8
Public juridic person ensures Catholic presence. How one Catholic healthcare system assumed a lay model of sponsorship.
Health Prog. 1996 Jan-Feb;77(1):25-7.
9
Guidelines for evaluating potential joint ventures.评估潜在合资企业的指南。
Health Prog. 1987 Apr;68(3):58-61.
10
Juridic status: canonical provisions, possible applications.法律地位:规范性条款,可能的应用。
Health Prog. 1986 Sep;67(7):41-5.