Fattore G, Jommi C
CeRGAS (Centro di Ricerche sulla Gestione dell'Assistenza Sanitaria), Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi, Milan, Italy.
Health Policy. 1998 Oct;46(1):21-41. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(98)00047-5.
Pressed by an impressive series of corruption scandals and by a change of attitude towards cost-containment, the Italian pharmaceutical sector's regulatory environment was radically changed in 1994. Regulatory power was concentrated on a national technical body (CUF) and a new set of measures was taken, including a nationwide drug expenditure budget, a redefinition of both the positive list and the cost-sharing rules, and new price-setting models. As a result, in the period 1993-1996, nominal expenditures decreased by about L 1600 billion (ECU 83.6 billion at 1997 exchange rate), that is from 13.3% to 11.0% of current National Health Service (NHS) expenditure. While in the 1980s Italy was one of the most generous countries in funding pharmaceuticals, it is now one of the most parsimonious. Although the overall pharmaceutical market shrank in 1994 and 1995, a substantial part of NHS drug-bill savings resulted from cost-shifting from the public sector to patients, mainly because physicians have not aligned their prescribing behaviour to the new positive list. The new Italian approach to containing pharmaceutical costs has been certainly effective, at least in the short run. However, new relevant issues are emerging regarding the fall of NHS pharmaceutical coverage, the centralised nature of the Italian pharmaceutical policy and the gap between scientific based policies and actual prescribing behaviours.
在一系列令人瞩目的腐败丑闻以及对成本控制态度转变的压力下,意大利制药行业的监管环境在1994年发生了根本性变化。监管权力集中于一个国家技术机构(CUF),并采取了一系列新措施,包括制定全国性药品支出预算、重新定义正面清单和费用分摊规则,以及采用新的定价模式。结果,在1993 - 1996年期间,名义支出减少了约160000亿里拉(按1997年汇率换算为836亿欧元),即从占当前国家医疗服务体系(NHS)支出的13.3%降至11.0%。在20世纪80年代,意大利是为药品提供资金最为慷慨的国家之一,而如今却成了最为吝啬的国家之一。尽管1994年和1995年整个制药市场萎缩,但国家医疗服务体系药品账单节省的很大一部分是由于成本从公共部门转移到了患者身上,主要原因是医生的处方行为并未与新的正面清单保持一致。意大利控制药品成本的新方法在短期内肯定是有效的。然而,关于国家医疗服务体系药品覆盖范围的下降、意大利制药政策的集中性质以及基于科学的政策与实际处方行为之间的差距等新的相关问题正在浮现。