Suppr超能文献

基于参考的定价方案:对药品支出、资源利用和健康结果的影响。

Reference-based pricing schemes: effect on pharmaceutical expenditure, resource utilisation and health outcomes.

作者信息

Ioannides-Demos Lisa L, Ibrahim Joseph E, McNeil John J

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20(9):577-91. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200220090-00002.

Abstract

Pharmaceutical expenditure is rising more rapidly than the general inflation rate in most advanced countries. One strategy that has been introduced to control pharmaceutical costs is reference-based pricing (RBP). Its potential is restricted to those specific segments of the drug market where several drugs (and/or their generic forms) exist without substantial evidence that any particular agent is superior. Three broad approaches have been adopted. These involve the aggregation of drugs into generic groups, related drug groups (e.g. ACE inhibitors) or drugs grouped by therapeutic indication (e.g. antihypertensives). For each drug group, a single reimbursement level or reference price is set. Drugs above the reference price require part or total payment by the patient. The experience with RBP ranges from over 10 years in Germany (involving all levels of RBP) to the more recent implementation of RBP for related drug groups in Australia. This review summarises the current state of knowledge on RBP from the published experiences in the countries where RBP has been adopted. The published systematic reviews of RBP from the countries that have implemented it suggest that RBP has been successful at temporarily capping drug prices for the RBP drug groups and achieving short term cost savings. However, other factors influencing total pharmaceutical expenditure have often occurred simultaneously and make it difficult to isolate specific effects of RBP. Further investigation is required before any valid conclusions can be drawn about the net effect of RBP on healthcare costs. RBP has withstood the initial legal challenges of pharmaceutical companies and the criticisms of some clinicians. Where the reference price is based on the lowest priced drug(s) in the group, RBP appears to be one of the few strategies likely to be effective at encouraging doctors to use the least expensive agents as first-line therapy and utilise more expensive agents in those who experience side effects or poor efficacy.

摘要

在大多数发达国家,药品支出的增长速度超过了一般通货膨胀率。为控制药品成本而引入的一种策略是参考定价(RBP)。其潜力仅限于药品市场中那些存在几种药物(和/或其仿制药形式)但没有充分证据表明任何一种特定药物更具优势的特定细分市场。已采用三种主要方法。这些方法包括将药物汇总为通用组、相关药物组(如血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂)或按治疗适应症分组的药物(如抗高血压药)。对于每个药物组,设定一个单一的报销水平或参考价格。高于参考价格的药物需要患者部分或全部支付费用。RBP的经验范围从德国实施超过10年(涉及所有级别的RBP)到澳大利亚最近对相关药物组实施RBP。本综述总结了从已采用RBP的国家的公开经验中获得的关于RBP的当前知识状态。已实施RBP的国家发表的关于RBP的系统评价表明,RBP在暂时限制RBP药物组的药品价格并实现短期成本节约方面取得了成功。然而,影响药品总支出的其他因素往往同时出现,使得难以分离出RBP的具体影响。在就RBP对医疗保健成本的净影响得出任何有效结论之前,还需要进一步调查。RBP经受住了制药公司最初的法律挑战以及一些临床医生的批评。当参考价格基于该组中价格最低的药物时,RBP似乎是少数几种可能有效鼓励医生将最便宜的药物用作一线治疗,并在出现副作用或疗效不佳的患者中使用更昂贵药物的策略之一。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验