Ghislandi Simone, Krulichova Iva, Garattini Livio
Centre for Health Economics CESAV, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Via Camozzi 3, 24020 Ranica, BG, Italy.
Health Policy. 2005 Apr;72(1):53-63. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.02.012.
Italian pharmaceutical policy has recently moved towards a "two lanes" approach, with regulation differing according to a drug's patent status. This study analyses the Italian regulatory framework, focusing on policies related to "off-patent" drugs. Three main regulatory innovations have been examined: (i) generics, introduced in Italy for the first time in 1996; (ii) the reference pricing (RP) scheme, under which consumers pay part of the cost of high-priced products; (iii) pharmacists' right of substitution, supported by a regressive margins system. The recent reforms are already producing some worthwhile results, at least in terms of competitive pressure on the (few) substances that run out of patent protection. However, further intervention could be required to achieve long-term sustainability.
意大利的药品政策最近转向了一种“双轨制”方法,监管根据药品的专利状况而有所不同。本研究分析了意大利的监管框架,重点关注与“专利过期”药物相关的政策。研究考察了三项主要的监管创新举措:(i)仿制药,于1996年首次在意大利推出;(ii)参考定价(RP)方案,即消费者需支付高价产品部分费用;(iii)药剂师的替换权,并辅以递减利润制度。最近的改革已经产生了一些有价值的成果,至少在对(少数)失去专利保护的药品的竞争压力方面是如此。然而,可能需要进一步干预以实现长期可持续性。