Suppr超能文献

舍曲林与去甲替林治疗70岁及以上老年重度抑郁症的疗效和安全性比较

Comparative efficacy and safety of sertraline versus nortriptyline in major depression in patients 70 and older.

作者信息

Finkel S I, Richter E M, Clary C M

机构信息

Northwestern University Medical School, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Chicago, IL 60611-3317, USA.

出版信息

Int Psychogeriatr. 1999 Mar;11(1):85-99. doi: 10.1017/s104161029900561x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few randomized, double-blind studies that examine antidepressant treatment in patients 70 years and older are available. To provide additional data on the safety and efficacy of antidepressants in this rapidly growing population segment, a subgroup analysis of a larger sertraline vs. nortriptyline elderly depression treatment study was performed.

METHODS

Outpatients (N = 76) who met DSM-III-R criteria for major depression with a minimum Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) severity score of 18 were randomized to 12 weeks of flexible dose treatment with sertraline (50-150 mg) or nortriptyline (25-100 mg).

RESULTS

Both treatments significantly improved depression as measured by the HAM-D and Clinical Global Impression scales. At Weeks 10, 12, and endpoint, sertraline demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in depression severity compared to nortriptyline as measured by improvement on the 24-item HAM-D (mean adjusted change score of 14.8 vs. 7.6, respectively, at Week 12; p = .001). Sixty-five percent of sertraline-treated patients were responders by Week 12 (50% or greater reduction from baseline in 24-item HAM-D score) compared to 26% of nortriptyline-treated patients (p < .05). Sertraline treatment had a significantly more positive effect, when compared to nortriptyline, across almost all associated measures of cognitive function, energy, anxiety, and quality of life and was better tolerated than nortriptyline, with a lower attrition rate/side effect burden.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy advantage of sertraline appeared to be even greater in this subgroup of older patients drawn from a larger treatment study of depression that included elderly individuals over the age of 60.

摘要

背景

针对70岁及以上患者抗抑郁治疗的随机双盲研究寥寥无几。为了给这一快速增长的人群提供有关抗抑郁药安全性和有效性的更多数据,对一项更大规模的舍曲林与去甲替林治疗老年抑郁症研究进行了亚组分析。

方法

符合DSM-III-R重度抑郁症标准且汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)严重程度评分至少为18分的门诊患者(N = 76)被随机分配接受为期12周的舍曲林(50 - 150毫克)或去甲替林(25 - 100毫克)灵活剂量治疗。

结果

通过HAM-D和临床总体印象量表测量,两种治疗均显著改善了抑郁症状。在第10周、12周和研究终点,通过24项HAM-D量表改善情况测量,舍曲林显示出与去甲替林相比抑郁严重程度显著更大幅度的降低(第12周时平均调整变化得分分别为14.8和7.6;p = 0.001)。到第12周时,65%接受舍曲林治疗的患者为有效者(24项HAM-D评分较基线降低50%或更多),而去甲替林治疗患者中这一比例为26%(p < 0.05)。与去甲替林相比,舍曲林治疗在几乎所有认知功能、精力、焦虑和生活质量相关测量指标上均有显著更积极的效果,且耐受性优于去甲替林,脱落率/副作用负担更低。

结论

在这项从一项纳入了60岁以上老年人的更大规模抑郁症治疗研究中抽取的老年患者亚组中,舍曲林的疗效优势似乎更为明显。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验