van den Oord E J, Rispens J
Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1999 Mar;40(3):417-30. doi: 10.1017/s002196309800359x.
We examined differences between school classes with respect to three aspects of psychosocial adjustment at school, namely the extent that children in the class liked to play with each other, the number of teacher-reported behaviour problems, and children's feelings of wellbeing at school. The sample consisted of 1282 4- to 5-year-olds from 94 school classes and 51 schools, but due to nonresponse actual sample sizes were somewhat smaller for most analyses. Multilevel analyses showed that on average 87% of the variance was at the child level, 11% at the class level, and 3% at the school level. This indicated that a non-negligible amount of variance could not be accounted for by factors at the child level. Furthermore, this variance was mainly associated with differences between classes instead of differences between schools. A set of variables that pertained to sociodemographic characteristics of schools, school facilities, organisational aspects of classrooms, and the teacher did not provide an adequate explanation for the differences in adjustment levels. In contrast to these traditional variables, social network indices yielded substantial correlations, showed consistent trends across the different adjustment measures, and fulfilled the necessary requirement that to explain differences between school classes the predictor variables themselves should differ for classes within the same school. These results suggested that aspects of the interpersonal relations of children in the classroom such as proximity, integration, and the amount of contact could be determinants of differences between school classes in psychosocial adjustment.
我们考察了不同班级在学校心理社会适应的三个方面的差异,即班级中儿童相互玩耍的喜爱程度、教师报告的行为问题数量以及儿童在学校的幸福感。样本包括来自94个班级和51所学校的1282名4至5岁儿童,但由于存在无回应情况,大多数分析的实际样本量略小。多层次分析表明,平均而言,87%的方差在儿童层面,11%在班级层面,3%在学校层面。这表明儿童层面的因素无法解释的方差量不可忽略。此外,这种方差主要与班级之间的差异相关,而非学校之间的差异。一组与学校的社会人口特征、学校设施、教室组织方面以及教师相关的变量,并未充分解释适应水平的差异。与这些传统变量不同,社会网络指数产生了显著的相关性,在不同的适应测量中呈现出一致的趋势,并且满足了解释班级之间差异的必要要求,即预测变量本身在同一学校的不同班级之间应该有所不同。这些结果表明,课堂上儿童人际关系的一些方面,如亲近程度、融合程度和接触量,可能是学校班级在心理社会适应方面存在差异的决定因素。