Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, United States of America.
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America; Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA, United States of America.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2024 Jan-Feb;82:90-101. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2024.01.010. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
Heart failure (HF) poses a significant economic burden in the US, with costs projected to reach $70 billion by 2030. Cost-effectiveness analyses play a pivotal role in assessing the economic value of HF therapies. In this review, we overview the cost-effectiveness of HF therapies and discuss ways to improve patient access. Based on current costs, guideline directed medical therapies for HF with reduced ejection fraction provide high economic value except for sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, which provide intermediate economic value. Combining therapy with the four pillars of medical therapy also has intermediate economic value, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranging from $73,000 to $98,500/ quality adjusted life-years. High economic value procedures include cardiac resynchronization devices, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, and coronary artery bypass surgery. In contrast, advanced HF therapies have previously demonstrated intermediate to low economic value, but newer data appear more favorable. Given the affordability challenges of HF therapies, additional efforts are needed to ensure optimal care for patients. The recent Inflation Reduction Act contains provisions to reform policy pertaining to drug price negotiation and out-of-pocket spending, as well as measures to increase access to existing programs, including the Medicare low-income subsidy. On a patient level, it is also important to encourage patient and physician awareness and discussions surrounding medical costs. Overall, a broad approach to improving available therapies and access to care is needed to reduce the growing clinical and economic morbidity of HF.
心力衰竭(HF)在美国造成了巨大的经济负担,预计到 2030 年成本将达到 700 亿美元。成本效益分析在评估 HF 治疗的经济价值方面发挥着关键作用。在这篇综述中,我们概述了 HF 治疗的成本效益,并讨论了改善患者获得治疗的方法。基于目前的成本,指南指导的射血分数降低的心力衰竭药物治疗具有高经济价值,除了钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白 2 抑制剂,其具有中等经济价值。联合治疗与医学治疗的四大支柱也具有中等的经济价值,增量成本效益比为 73000 美元至 98500 美元/质量调整生命年。高经济价值的程序包括心脏再同步装置、植入式心脏复律除颤器和冠状动脉旁路手术。相比之下,先进的 HF 治疗以前表现出中等至低的经济价值,但新的数据似乎更有利。鉴于 HF 治疗的可负担性挑战,需要做出额外的努力,以确保为患者提供最佳护理。最近的《降低通胀法案》包含了一些条款,旨在改革与药品价格谈判和自付费用相关的政策,以及增加现有计划(包括医疗保险低收入补贴)获得途径的措施。在患者层面,鼓励患者和医生提高对医疗费用的认识和讨论也很重要。总的来说,需要采取广泛的方法来改善现有治疗方法和获得护理的机会,以降低 HF 日益增长的临床和经济负担。