Desmet M, Chowdhury A Q, Islam M K
Health Systems Research, Public Health Sciences Division, ICDDR,B Centre for Health and Population Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Soc Sci Med. 1999 Apr;48(7):925-38. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00393-1.
Health insurance schemes are usually assessed according to technical indicators. This approach, however, neglects the dynamic perspective of insurance schemes as an element of people's mobilisation for participation in organising and managing health care delivery and financing. The first part of this paper describes the technical performance and the level of community involvement in management of the two largest health insurance schemes in Bangladesh, both in the rural areas and in the non-government sector. Part two discusses these achievements in light of the schemes' potential role as a mechanism for people's management of health care. A review of documents and key-informant interviews were conducted. Key findings include that (1) subscribers currently are not actively participating in scheme management. However, existing family groups, involved in credit programmes may serve as entry-points for interaction. This is sustained by the 'natural link' between health insurance as a means of spreading the risks of treatment costs and credit programmes as a means of decreasing the relative impact of illness on household income. (2) The schemes' role could be further enhanced, by improving their technical performance and applying health care systems elements with the input of all partners involved. These issues are avoidance of service duplication with other providers; better protection of the poorer households; inclusion of hospital care in the coverage package; simplification of scheme administration by introduction of episode-based co-payments instead of the current itemised ones and concentrating the schemes at the level of community-based services, which may be self-financed and also self-managed by the community, given available sensitisation, training and interaction. A shift to episode-based co-payments would also introduce solidarity among patients and among individuals at higher risk, such as pregnant women and under-fives. Finally, action-research is needed to document the process of increased community involvement.
医疗保险计划通常根据技术指标进行评估。然而,这种方法忽略了保险计划作为人们参与组织和管理医疗保健服务提供与融资的一个要素的动态视角。本文第一部分描述了孟加拉国农村地区和非政府部门两个最大医疗保险计划的技术绩效以及社区参与管理的程度。第二部分根据这些计划作为人们管理医疗保健的一种机制的潜在作用来讨论这些成就。进行了文件审查和关键信息提供者访谈。主要发现包括:(1)目前参保者没有积极参与计划管理。然而,参与信贷计划的现有家庭群体可能成为互动的切入点。这通过医疗保险作为分散治疗费用风险的手段与信贷计划作为减少疾病对家庭收入相对影响的手段之间的“自然联系”得以维持。(2)通过改善技术绩效并在所有相关伙伴的参与下应用医疗保健系统要素,这些计划的作用可以得到进一步加强。这些问题包括避免与其他提供者的服务重复;更好地保护较贫困家庭;将住院护理纳入保险范围;通过引入按疾病发作支付共付费用而非当前的逐项支付来简化计划管理,并将计划集中在社区服务层面,在有可用的宣传、培训和互动的情况下,社区服务可以自筹资金并由社区自我管理。转向按疾病发作支付共付费用还将在患者之间以及高风险个体(如孕妇和五岁以下儿童)之间引入团结。最后,需要进行行动研究来记录社区参与增加的过程。