Ruggieri M, McShane M A
Department of Paediatrics, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Arch Dis Child. 1998 Nov;79(5):423-6. doi: 10.1136/adc.79.5.423.
To explore parents' opinions and concerns about seizures, anticonvulsants, and the effect of treatment in children with Angelman syndrome.
A postal questionnaire was sent to members of one of the UK lay groups for Angelman syndrome (ASSERT) who had a child affected by Angelman syndrome. The questionnaire requested general medical information and information about the epilepsy, its treatment, and treatment responses.
One hundred and fifty questionnaires were sent out with an ASSERT routine mailing and 78 completed questionnaires were returned. Forty three patients were boys and 35 were girls; ages ranged from 1.7 to 25 years (mean 7.5 years). The overall general clinical and cytogenetic data were mostly consistent with previous reports. Epilepsy was reported in 68 children, most of whom had a detectable cytogenetic deletion. The most common seizure types reported by the families were absence seizures, tonic clonic seizures, drop attacks, and myoclonic seizures; in four patients only febrile seizures occurred. The age at onset of the seizures was < 2 years in more than half of the patients. Anti-epileptic drug treatment with valproate (VPA), clonazepam (CZP), and lamotrigine (LTG) as monotherapy or a combination of VPA and CZP or VPA and LTG was more often viewed favourably and considered effective with fewer side effects on the child's behaviour and alertness, versus more frequent adverse effects and increased frequency and severity of seizures with carbamazepine (CBZ) and vigabatrin (VGB) in monotherapy or in combination with other anti-epileptic drugs. Seizures did tend to improve with age but were still present and disabling at older ages.
This is the first study to record parents' opinions about seizures, anti-epileptic drugs, and treatment responses in children with Angelman syndrome, and it is one of the largest series on epilepsy and Angelman syndrome to be reported to date.
探讨父母对于安格曼综合征患儿癫痫发作、抗惊厥药物及治疗效果的看法和担忧。
向英国一个针对安格曼综合征的非专业组织(ASSERT)的成员发送了一份邮政调查问卷,这些成员家中有患安格曼综合征的孩子。问卷要求提供一般医疗信息以及有关癫痫、其治疗和治疗反应的信息。
随ASSERT的常规邮件发出了150份问卷,共收回78份完整问卷。43例患者为男孩,35例为女孩;年龄范围为1.7至25岁(平均7.5岁)。总体的一般临床和细胞遗传学数据大多与先前报告一致。68名儿童报告患有癫痫,其中大多数有可检测到的细胞遗传学缺失。家庭报告的最常见癫痫发作类型为失神发作、强直阵挛发作、跌倒发作和肌阵挛发作;4例患者仅发生热性惊厥。超过一半的患者癫痫发作起始年龄小于2岁。与单独使用卡马西平(CBZ)和氨己烯酸(VGB)或与其他抗癫痫药物联合使用相比,单独使用丙戊酸盐(VPA)、氯硝西泮(CZP)和拉莫三嗪(LTG)作为单一疗法或VPA与CZP或VPA与LTG联合使用的抗癫痫药物治疗更常被看好,且被认为对孩子的行为和警觉性副作用较少,而单独使用CBZ和VGB或与其他抗癫痫药物联合使用则不良反应更频繁,癫痫发作频率和严重程度增加。癫痫发作确实倾向于随年龄改善,但在较大年龄时仍存在且致残。
这是第一项记录父母对安格曼综合征患儿癫痫发作、抗癫痫药物和治疗反应看法的研究,也是迄今为止报道的关于癫痫和安格曼综合征的最大系列研究之一。