Craig D B, McCarthy D S, Gilmour I J, Wood L D, Cherniack R M
Respir Physiol. 1976 Dec;28(3):325-31. doi: 10.1016/0034-5687(76)90027-x.
Comparison of the nitrogen method closing volume (CV) test, with oxygen inspiration initiated at residual volume (RV method) and functional residual capacity (FRC method), was made in 91 seated normal subjects. For RV and FRC methods, respectively CV%VC (mean+/-SD) was 14.4% (+/-6.2) and 17.5%(+/-7.5) (P=0.005); slope of Phase III of CV trace was 0.99% N2/1 (+/-0.76) and 1.66% N2/1(+/-1.07) (P=0.005); size of cardiogenic oscillations was 1.05% N2(+/-0.42) and 1.21% N2(+/-0.40) (P=0.001). These data confirm earlier predictions, based on a calculated increased lung top to bottom N2 gradient in the FRC method. Support for this mechanism was obtained in 5 additional normal subjects in whom the increased CV%VC, slope of Phase III and size of cardiogenic oscillations with the FRC method were eliminated when the top-to-bottom N2 gradient was reduced by breathing a reduced FIN2. Measurements made using the classical RV method cannot be directly compared to those using the FRC method.
对91名坐位正常受试者进行了氮法闭合气量(CV)测试的比较,分别采用在残气量时开始吸入氧气的方法(残气量法,RV法)和在功能残气量时开始吸入氧气的方法(功能残气量法,FRC法)。对于RV法和FRC法,CV%VC(均值±标准差)分别为14.4%(±6.2)和17.5%(±7.5)(P = 0.005);CV曲线第三相的斜率分别为0.99% N₂/升(±0.76)和1.66% N₂/升(±1.07)(P = 0.005);心源性振荡的大小分别为1.05% N₂(±0.42)和1.21% N₂(±0.40)(P = 0.001)。这些数据证实了早期基于FRC法中计算得出的肺上下部氮梯度增加的预测。在另外5名正常受试者中得到了对该机制的支持,当通过吸入低氮浓度的气体降低上下部氮梯度时,FRC法中增加的CV%VC、第三相斜率和心源性振荡大小均消失。使用经典RV法所做的测量不能直接与使用FRC法所做的测量进行比较。