Stokes O W, Fiore P M, Barss J T, Koerber A, Gilbert J L, Lautenschlager E P
Department of Endodontics, Northwestern University Dental School, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
J Endod. 1999 Jan;25(1):17-20. doi: 10.1016/s0099-2399(99)80392-6.
This study evaluated and compared the corrosion susceptibility of stainless-steel and nickel-titanium (NiTi) endodontic files immersed in sodium hypochlorite. For each of the stainless-steel files (Kerr K-Flex, Caulk Flex-O, and Union Broach Flex-R) plus the NiTi files (Union Broach NiTi and Tulsa NiTi), the cutting flutes of 24 ISO size 20 files were immersed into 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. Their open circuit potential (OCP) was recorded for 1 h on a strip chart with high impedance. The strip chart recording for each file was classified into a stability score: (i) stable, (ii) unstable, or (iii) erratic. The OCP was measured by a potentiostat and a standard calomel electrode reference. The OCP classification of unstable and erratic for the files evaluated were as follows: K-Flex (16%), Flex-R (12%), Flex-O (75%), Union Broach NiTi (62%), and Tulsa NiTi (0%). After OCP testing, each of the 120 files was inspected by light microscopy at x 25. The frequencies of visually observed corrosion were detected as follows: K-Flex (2/24), Flex-R (1/24), Flex-O (6/24), Union Broach NiTi (2/24), and Tulsa NiTi (0/24). There was a significant difference in corrosion frequency between brands when evaluated by OCP and light microscopy; however, there was no significant difference between stainless steel and NiTi.
本研究评估并比较了浸泡在次氯酸钠中的不锈钢和镍钛(NiTi)根管锉的耐腐蚀性能。对于每种不锈钢锉(Kerr K-Flex、Caulk Flex-O和Union Broach Flex-R)以及镍钛锉(Union Broach NiTi和Tulsa NiTi),将24支ISO 20号锉的切割凹槽浸入5.25%的次氯酸钠中。在具有高阻抗的带状图表上记录它们的开路电位(OCP)1小时。将每个锉的带状图表记录分类为稳定性评分:(i)稳定,(ii)不稳定,或(iii)不稳定。通过恒电位仪和标准甘汞电极参比测量OCP。所评估锉的不稳定和不稳定的OCP分类如下:K-Flex(16%)、Flex-R(12%)、Flex-O(75%)、Union Broach NiTi(62%)和Tulsa NiTi(0%)。在OCP测试后,通过25倍光学显微镜检查120支锉中的每一支。目视观察到的腐蚀频率如下:K-Flex(2/24)、Flex-R(1/24)、Flex-O(6/24)、Union Broach NiTi(2/24)和Tulsa NiTi(0/24)。通过OCP和光学显微镜评估时,各品牌之间的腐蚀频率存在显著差异;然而,不锈钢和镍钛之间没有显著差异。