• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无需体外循环的多条动脉血管搭桥:早期血管造影结果

Multiple arterial conduits without cardiopulmonary bypass: early angiographic results.

作者信息

Calafiore A M, Teodori G, Di Giammarco G, Vitolla G, Maddestra N, Paloscia L, Zimarino M, Mazzei V

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Surgery, University G. D Annunzio, Chieti, Italy.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 Feb;67(2):450-6. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)01194-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0003-4975(98)01194-1
PMID:10197669
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lack of angiographic results and technical difficulty in grafting the vessels in the lateral and posterior walls have reduced interest in myocardial revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We describe our experience to demonstrate the feasibility of coronary surgical intervention without CPB in multivessel disease.

METHODS

From May 21, 1997, through February 1998, 227 patients underwent revascularization with two or more arterial conduits as the first operation: 122 without CPB (group A) and 105 with CPB (group B). Group A included a greater number of high-risk patients.

RESULTS

Mean +/- SD anastomoses per patient were 2.5 +/- 0.6 in group A and 2.8 +/- 0.8 in group B (p = NS). No patient died in group A, whereas 1 patient (0.9%) died in group B. The postoperative complication rate was low in both groups, but intensive care unit and in-hospital stays were shorter in group A than in group B (14.1 +/- 7.1 versus 27.3 +/- 36 hours, p < 0.001, and 4.1 +/- 1.6 versus 5.4 +/- 2.4 days, p < 0.001, respectively [group A versus group B]). Sixty-seven patients in Group A (54.9%) underwent postoperative angiography 33 +/- 35 days after operation. The patency rate was 98.9% (98.2% for the marginal branches).

CONCLUSIONS

Arterial revascularization of the coronary arteries without CPB is feasible, with results similar to those obtained with CPB. The two techniques, in our opinion, are complementary, not antagonistic.

摘要

背景

缺乏血管造影结果以及在侧壁和后壁血管移植中的技术难度降低了人们对非体外循环(CPB)心肌血运重建的兴趣。我们描述我们的经验以证明在多支血管病变中进行非体外循环冠状动脉手术干预的可行性。

方法

从1997年5月21日至1998年2月,227例患者首次接受了使用两根或更多动脉移植物的血运重建手术:122例非体外循环(A组)和105例体外循环(B组)。A组中高危患者数量更多。

结果

A组患者平均每位的吻合口数为2.5±0.6,B组为2.8±0.8(p=无显著差异)。A组无患者死亡,而B组有1例患者(0.9%)死亡。两组术后并发症发生率均较低,但A组的重症监护病房和住院时间均短于B组(分别为14.1±7.1对27.3±36小时,p<0.001,以及4.1±1.6对5.4±2.4天,p<0.001[A组对B组])。A组67例患者(54.9%)在术后33±35天接受了血管造影。通畅率为98.9%(边缘支为98.2%)。

结论

非体外循环下冠状动脉动脉血运重建是可行的,结果与体外循环相似。我们认为,这两种技术是互补的,而非对立的。

相似文献

1
Multiple arterial conduits without cardiopulmonary bypass: early angiographic results.无需体外循环的多条动脉血管搭桥:早期血管造影结果
Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 Feb;67(2):450-6. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)01194-1.
2
Recent advances in multivessel coronary grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass.非体外循环下多支冠状动脉移植术的最新进展。
Heart Surg Forum. 1998;1(1):20-5.
3
Left main coronary artery stenosis: early experience with surgical revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass.左冠状动脉主干狭窄:非体外循环下外科血运重建的早期经验
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2000 Apr;41(2):175-9.
4
What is 'minimally invasive' coronary bypass surgery? Experience with a variety of surgical revascularization procedures for single-vessel disease.什么是“微创”冠状动脉搭桥手术?单支血管病变的各种外科血运重建手术经验。
Chest. 1997 Nov 5;112(5):1409-16. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.5.1409.
5
Complete revascularization in coronary artery bypass grafting with and without cardiopulmonary bypass.冠状动脉搭桥术中在有和没有体外循环情况下的完全血运重建
Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Jan;71(1):165-9. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)02230-x.
6
Coronary bypass surgery performed off pump does not result in lower in-hospital morbidity than coronary artery bypass grafting performed on pump.非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术并不比体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术导致更低的院内发病率。
Circulation. 2004 Feb 24;109(7):887-92. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000115943.41814.7D. Epub 2004 Feb 2.
7
Clinical outcomes, angiographic patency, and resource utilization in 200 consecutive off-pump coronary bypass patients.200例非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥患者的临床结局、血管造影通畅率及资源利用情况
Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 May;71(5):1477-83; discussion 1483-4. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)02473-0.
8
Minimally invasive direct coronary bypass versus cardiopulmonary technique: angiographic comparison.微创直接冠状动脉旁路移植术与心肺技术:血管造影比较
Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 Feb;67(2):500-3. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)01251-x.
9
Coronary bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass--technical considerations, clinical results, and follow-up.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999 Feb;47(1):14-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1013101.
10
Off-pump myocardial revascularization using arterial conduits without cardiopulmonary bypass.非体外循环下使用动脉血管桥的非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术
J Card Surg. 2000 Jul-Aug;15(4):251-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2000.tb01286.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and resource utilisation efficiency of semi-skeletonised versus skeletonised left internal mammary artery harvesting techniques: The BANGABANDHU study.半骨骼化与骨骼化左乳内动脉获取技术的安全性和资源利用效率:孟加拉国研究
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 5;20(9):e0331285. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331285. eCollection 2025.
2
Robotic-Assisted Microsurgery and Its Future in Plastic Surgery.机器人辅助显微外科手术及其在整形外科中的未来
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 13;11(12):3378. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123378.
3
Comparison of early outcomes associated with coronary artery bypass grafting for multi-vessel disease conducted using minimally invasive or conventional off-pump techniques: a propensity-matched study based on SYNTAX score.
基于 SYNTAX 评分的多支血管病变行微创或传统非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的早期结局比较:倾向评分匹配研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Jun 7;17(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-01905-8.
4
Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in Brazil: Analysis of the National Reality Through the BYPASS Registry.巴西的冠状动脉搭桥手术:通过BYPASS注册研究分析国家实际情况
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Mar-Apr;34(2):142-148. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0313.
5
Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: 30 Years of Debate.非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术:30年的争论
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Aug 21;7(16):e009934. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009934.
6
Coronary artery bypass grafting off-pump or on-pump: another brick in the wall.非体外循环或体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术:墙上的又一块砖。
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Apr;5(7):168. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.03.52.
7
Activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis during coronary artery bypass grafting: a comparison between on-pump and off-pump techniques.冠状动脉搭桥术中凝血与纤溶的激活:体外循环与非体外循环技术的比较
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2014 Dec;30(4):333-41. doi: 10.1007/s12288-013-0250-7. Epub 2013 Apr 26.
8
Clinical outcome and quality of life after reoperative CABG: off-pump versus on-pump - observational pilot study.再次冠状动脉旁路移植术后的临床结局及生活质量:非体外循环与体外循环对照——观察性初步研究
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Apr 5;8:66. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-8-66.
9
Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting through left antero-lateral thoracotomy (thora-cab) - case report and review of literature.经左前外侧胸廓切开术的非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(胸廓冠状动脉搭桥术)——病例报告及文献综述
Oman Med J. 2008 Oct;23(4):278-81.
10
Coronary artery bypass.冠状动脉搭桥术
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006 Mar;88(2):99-102. doi: 10.1308/003588406X95165.