Suppr超能文献

半骨骼化与骨骼化左乳内动脉获取技术的安全性和资源利用效率:孟加拉国研究

Safety and resource utilisation efficiency of semi-skeletonised versus skeletonised left internal mammary artery harvesting techniques: The BANGABANDHU study.

作者信息

Ranjan Redoy, Momin Aziz, Kaba Riyaz A, Ken-Dror Gie, Raha Sanjay Kumar, Hasan Md Kamrul, Chandrasekaran Venkatachalam, Adhikary Asit Baran

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Department of Cardiac Surgery, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Sep 5;20(9):e0331285. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331285. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The ideal harvesting techniques of the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) are elusive. We assessed the safety and resource utilisation efficiency of semi-skeletonised LIMA harvesting techniques, focusing on length, harvesting time, and the number of Ligaclips used compared to skeletonised techniques within a single surgeon's practice.

METHODS

The BANGABANDHU (Bangladeshi Atherosclerosis Biobank AND Hub) study was an ambispective observational cohort that evaluated age- and sex-matched 2209 adult Bangladeshi isolated CABG population from 1st January 2015 to 31 January 2025. Univariate analysis observed the difference pattern in the dataset, while multivariate logistic regression (LR) analysis identified the independent variables associated with the advantage of semi-skelitonised LIMA. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve demonstrated the goodness-of-fit of the prediction model.

RESULTS

We evaluated 2209 age- and sex-matched adult isolated CABG patients (skeletonised LIMA; n = 1050 and semi-skeletonised LIMA; n = 1159) with identical comorbidities (EuroSCORE II, hypertension, diabetes, renal impairment, COPD, left main and multivessel coronary artery disease) between study groups (p > 0.05). LIMA harvest time (35.9 ± 5.5 vs 16.6 ± 3.9; p < 0.001) and number of used Ligaclip (23.6 ± 4.8 vs 11.7 ± 3.6; p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the skeletonised compared to the semi-skeletonised LIMA sample. Furthermore, an age and sex-adjusted multivariate logistic regression model found LIMA harvest time (odds ratio [OR] 0.067, 95% CI 0.01-0.39; p = 0.003) and number of used Ligaclip (OR 0.561, 95% CI 0.41-0.76; p < 0.001) significantly lower among semi-skeletonised LIMA techniques.

CONCLUSION

The semi-skeletonised LIMA technique is advantageous as it significantly reduces harvesting time and requires fewer Ligaclips compared to the skeletonised technique.

摘要

背景

用于冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的左乳内动脉(LIMA)的理想采集技术尚不清楚。我们评估了半骨骼化LIMA采集技术的安全性和资源利用效率,重点关注与骨骼化技术相比的长度、采集时间以及使用的结扎夹数量,研究对象为单一外科医生的临床实践。

方法

BANGABANDHU(孟加拉国动脉粥样硬化生物样本库与中心)研究是一项前瞻性观察队列研究,评估了2015年1月1日至2025年1月31日期间年龄和性别匹配的2209例成年孟加拉国孤立性CABG患者。单因素分析观察数据集中的差异模式,而多因素逻辑回归(LR)分析确定与半骨骼化LIMA优势相关的独立变量。受试者工作特征(AUROC)曲线下面积显示了预测模型的拟合优度。

结果

我们评估了2209例年龄和性别匹配的成年孤立性CABG患者(骨骼化LIMA组;n = 1050例和半骨骼化LIMA组;n = 1159例),两组患者合并症相同(欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II、高血压、糖尿病、肾功能损害、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、左主干和多支冠状动脉疾病)(p > 0.05)。与半骨骼化LIMA样本相比,骨骼化LIMA的采集时间(35.9 ± 5.5 vs 16.6 ± 3.9;p < 0.001)和使用的结扎夹数量(23.6 ± 4.8 vs 11.7 ± 3.6;p < 0.001)显著更高。此外,年龄和性别调整后的多因素逻辑回归模型发现,半骨骼化LIMA技术的LIMA采集时间(比值比[OR] 0.067, 95%可信区间0.01 - 0.39;p = 0.003)和使用的结扎夹数量(OR 0.561, 95%可信区间0.41 - 0.76;p < 0.001)显著更低。

结论

半骨骼化LIMA技术具有优势,因为与骨骼化技术相比,它显著减少了采集时间且需要的结扎夹更少。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验