• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不受欢迎的患者?谢菲尔德地区从全科医生名单中被移除的流行病学情况。

Unwelcome customers? The epidemiology of removal from general practitioner lists in Sheffield.

作者信息

Munro J, Skinner J

机构信息

Medical Care Research Unit, University of Sheffield.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Dec;48(437):1837-9.

PMID:10198503
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1313289/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 1990 contract and the 1991 fundholding scheme encouraged speculation that general practitioners (GPs) may remove patients from their lists for financial reasons. Despite assertions that patient removals are increasing, little evidence exists on the number or trends in removals.

AIM

To describe the epidemiology of removals by time, place, and person, and to determine whether removals have increased in recent years.

METHOD

Descriptive analysis of routine data relating to all removals of Sheffield residents from GP lists during 1991-1996.

RESULTS

Removal from a doctor's list was a rare event (2.4 per 1000 patients per year) that did not become more common over the period examined. Removal rates varied by age, sex, and practice, with relatively high rates among children, young women, and the over-75s. There was a significant tendency for higher removal rates in more deprived parts of the city.

CONCLUSION

Removal rates have not increased in Sheffield. The reasons for the variation in rates by age, sex, and practice are unknown. The higher rates noted in the under-fives and young women are consistent with the possibility that the 1990 target payment scheme may have increased removal rates in these age groups.

摘要

背景

1990年的合同和1991年的基金持有计划引发了人们的猜测,即全科医生(GPs)可能出于经济原因将患者从其名单中移除。尽管有人声称患者被移除的情况在增加,但关于移除的数量或趋势的证据很少。

目的

按时间、地点和人员描述移除的流行病学特征,并确定近年来移除情况是否有所增加。

方法

对1991 - 1996年期间谢菲尔德居民从全科医生名单中所有移除情况的常规数据进行描述性分析。

结果

从医生名单中移除是一个罕见事件(每年每1000名患者中有2.4例),在所研究的时间段内并未变得更加普遍。移除率因年龄、性别和诊所而异,儿童、年轻女性和75岁以上人群的移除率相对较高。该市较贫困地区的移除率有显著升高的趋势。

结论

谢菲尔德市的移除率没有增加。年龄、性别和诊所导致移除率差异的原因尚不清楚。五岁以下儿童和年轻女性中较高的移除率与1990年的目标支付计划可能增加了这些年龄组的移除率这一可能性相符。

相似文献

1
Unwelcome customers? The epidemiology of removal from general practitioner lists in Sheffield.不受欢迎的患者?谢菲尔德地区从全科医生名单中被移除的流行病学情况。
Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Dec;48(437):1837-9.
2
Patient removals from general practitioner lists in Northern Ireland: 1987-1996.北爱尔兰全科医生名单上患者的移除情况:1987 - 1996年
Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Oct;48(435):1669-73.
3
Patients who do not receive continuity of care from their general practitioner--are they a vulnerable group?那些没有从全科医生那里获得连续性医疗服务的患者——他们是弱势群体吗?
Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Mar;45(392):133-5.
4
Council tax valuation band of patient residence and clinical contacts in a general practice.全科医疗中患者住所及临床接触的市政税估值等级
Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Jan;55(510):32-6.
5
[Prevalence of diabetes, antidiabetic treatment and chronic diabetic complications reported by general practitioners].[全科医生报告的糖尿病患病率、抗糖尿病治疗及慢性糖尿病并发症情况]
Przegl Lek. 2005;62(4):201-5.
6
[Female and male general practitioners' patient lists].[女性和男性全科医生的患者名单]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2007 Oct 4;127(19):2508-12.
7
An investigation into GPs with high patient mortality rates: a retrospective study.对患者死亡率高的全科医生的调查:一项回顾性研究。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2005 Sep;27(3):270-5. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdi043. Epub 2005 Jul 6.
8
The removal of patients who live outside the practice boundary: a study of outside-area removals in Northern Ireland in 2001-2002.居住在执业范围以外患者的移除:2001 - 2002年北爱尔兰地区外移除情况的研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2005 May;55(514):384-6.
9
The doctor's deputizing service in a single-handed practice.单人执业诊所中的医生代理服务。
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1982 Sep;32(242):564-6.
10
Sore throat management in New Zealand general practice.新西兰全科医疗中喉咙痛的管理
N Z Med J. 2005 Aug 12;118(1220):U1609.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding "revolving door" patients in general practice: a qualitative study.了解全科医疗中的“旋转门”患者:一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Feb 13;15:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-33.
2
The struck-off mystery.被除名之谜。
J R Soc Med. 1999 Nov;92(11):608. doi: 10.1177/014107689909201128.
3
'Breaking up is hard to do': perspectives of general practitioners and patients towards removals from GP lists.“分手很难”:全科医生和患者对从全科医生名单中移除患者的看法。
Ir J Med Sci. 2007 Sep;176(3):221-4. doi: 10.1007/s11845-007-0062-6. Epub 2007 Jul 21.
4
The removal of patients who live outside the practice boundary: a study of outside-area removals in Northern Ireland in 2001-2002.居住在执业范围以外患者的移除:2001 - 2002年北爱尔兰地区外移除情况的研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2005 May;55(514):384-6.
5
Patients' accounts of being removed from their general practitioner's list: qualitative study.患者关于被从全科医生名单中除名的叙述:定性研究。
BMJ. 2003 Jun 14;326(7402):1316. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7402.1316.
6
Reasons for patient removals: results of a survey of 1005 GPs in Northern Ireland.患者被移除的原因:对北爱尔兰1005名全科医生的调查结果
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Aug;51(469):661-3.