• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

管理式医疗如何管理体弱老年人?以按服务收费系统与健康维护组织(HMO)系统中的医院再入院情况为例。

How does managed care manage the frail elderly? The case of hospital readmissions in fee-for-service versus HMO systems.

作者信息

Experton B, Ozminkowski R J, Pearlman D N, Li Z, Thompson S

机构信息

HUMETRIX, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 1999 Apr;16(3):163-72. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00098-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00098-1
PMID:10198653
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study examined whether hospital readmissions varied among the frail elderly in managed care versus fee-for-service (FFS) systems.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Random sample of 450 patients, aged 65 and over, from a large vertically integrated health care system in San Diego, California. Participants were receiving physician-authorized home health and survived and 18-month follow-up period.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to conduct comparisons of readmissions and preventable readmissions by plan type. Two methods to identify preventable readmissions were developed, one based on a computerized algorithm of service use patterns, and another based on blind clinical review.

RESULTS

The odds of having a preventable hospital readmission within 90 days of an index admission were 3.51 (P = 0.06) to 5.82 (P = 0.02) times as high for Medicare HMO enrollees compared to Medicare FFS participants, depending on the method used to assess preventability. Readmission patterns were similar for Medicare HMO enrollees and FFS study participants dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid.

CONCLUSION

In this group of frail elderly Medicare beneficiaries, those enrolled in an HMO were more likely to have a preventable hospital readmission than those receiving care under FFS. These results suggest that policies promoting stringent approaches to utilization control (e.g., early hospital discharge, reduced levels of post-acute care, and restricted use of home health services) may be problematic for the frail elderly.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨了在管理式医疗与按服务收费(FFS)系统中,体弱老年人的医院再入院情况是否存在差异。

设置与参与者

从加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥一个大型垂直整合医疗系统中随机抽取450名65岁及以上的患者。参与者正在接受医生授权的家庭保健服务,并且在18个月的随访期内存活。

主要结局指标

采用多元逻辑回归分析按计划类型对再入院和可预防再入院情况进行比较。开发了两种识别可预防再入院的方法,一种基于服务使用模式的计算机算法,另一种基于盲法临床评估。

结果

根据评估可预防性的方法不同,医疗保险健康维护组织(HMO)参保者在首次入院后90天内发生可预防医院再入院的几率是医疗保险FFS参与者的3.51倍(P = 0.06)至5.82倍(P = 0.02)。同时参加医疗保险和医疗补助的医疗保险HMO参保者和FFS研究参与者的再入院模式相似。

结论

在这组体弱的老年医疗保险受益人中,参加健康维护组织的人比接受FFS治疗的人更有可能发生可预防的医院再入院。这些结果表明,推广严格利用控制方法(如早期出院、降低急性后期护理水平和限制家庭保健服务使用)的政策可能对体弱老年人存在问题。

相似文献

1
How does managed care manage the frail elderly? The case of hospital readmissions in fee-for-service versus HMO systems.管理式医疗如何管理体弱老年人?以按服务收费系统与健康维护组织(HMO)系统中的医院再入院情况为例。
Am J Prev Med. 1999 Apr;16(3):163-72. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00098-1.
2
Transitions in health care use and expenditures among frail older adults by payor/provider type.按付款方/服务提供者类型划分的体弱老年人医疗保健使用和支出的转变。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 May;45(5):550-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb03086.x.
3
Rehospitalization and survival for stroke patients in managed care and traditional Medicare plans.在管理式医疗和传统医疗保险计划中,中风患者的再次住院情况和生存率。
Med Care. 2005 Sep;43(9):902-10. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000173597.97232.a0.
4
A comparison by payor/provider type of the cost of dying among frail older adults.按付款人/提供者类型对体弱老年人临终成本进行的比较。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996 Sep;44(9):1098-107. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb02947.x.
5
The impact of payor/provider type on health care use and expenditures among the frail elderly.支付方/医疗服务提供者类型对体弱老年人医疗保健使用及支出的影响。
Am J Public Health. 1997 Feb;87(2):210-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.2.210.
6
Variations in cataract extraction rates in Medicare prepaid and fee-for-service settings.医疗保险预付费和按服务收费模式下白内障摘除率的差异。
JAMA. 1997 Jun 11;277(22):1765-8.
7
Comparing post-acute rehabilitation use, length of stay, and outcomes experienced by Medicare fee-for-service and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with hip fracture in the United States: A secondary analysis of administrative data.比较美国 Medicare 按服务收费和 Medicare Advantage 受益人与髋部骨折相关的康复使用、住院时间和康复结局:基于行政数据的二次分析。
PLoS Med. 2018 Jun 26;15(6):e1002592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002592. eCollection 2018 Jun.
8
Disability outcomes of older Medicare HMO enrollees and fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries.老年医疗保险健康维护组织参保者和按服务收费医疗保险受益人的残疾状况
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 May;49(5):615-31. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49123.x.
9
Comparing mortality and time until death for medicare HMO and FFS beneficiaries.比较医疗保险健康维护组织(HMO)和按服务收费(FFS)受益人的死亡率及死亡时间。
Health Serv Res. 2001 Feb;35(6):1245-65.
10
Prostate cancer treatment and ten-year survival among group/staff HMO and fee-for-service Medicare patients.健康维护组织(HMO)团体/员工以及按服务收费的医疗保险患者的前列腺癌治疗与十年生存率
Health Serv Res. 1999 Jun;34(2):525-46.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards a patient journey perspective on causes of unplanned readmissions using a classification framework: results of a systematic review with narrative synthesis.从患者就医体验角度出发,利用分类框架探讨非计划性再入院的原因:系统评价的结果及叙述性综合。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Oct 4;19(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0822-9.
2
Reduction in Hospitals' Readmission Rates: Role of Hospital-Based Skilled Nursing Facilities.降低医院再入院率:医院专业护理机构的作用。
Inquiry. 2019 Jan-Dec;56:46958018817994. doi: 10.1177/0046958018817994.
3
Readmission rates of South Korean psychiatric inpatients by inpatient volumes per psychiatrist.
韩国精神科住院患者按每位精神科医生的住院患者数量计算的再入院率。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Apr 8;16:96. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0804-y.
4
The impact of home health length of stay and number of skilled nursing visits on hospitalization among Medicare-reimbursed skilled home health beneficiaries.医保报销的专业家庭健康受益人群中,家庭健康护理住院时长及专业护理访视次数对住院情况的影响。
Res Nurs Health. 2015 Aug;38(4):257-67. doi: 10.1002/nur.21665. Epub 2015 May 19.
5
Clinical preventability of 30-day readmission after percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后30天再入院的临床可预防性
J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Sep 26;3(5):e001290. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001290.
6
Better Quality of Care or Healthier Patients? Hospital Utilization by Medicare Advantage and Fee-for-Service Enrollees.更高质量的医疗服务还是更健康的患者?医疗保险优势计划和按服务收费参保者的医院利用情况
Forum Health Econ Policy. 2013 May 15;16(1):137-161. doi: 10.1515/fhep-2012-0037.
7
Proportion of hospital readmissions deemed avoidable: a systematic review.医院再入院可避免比例的系统评价。
CMAJ. 2011 Apr 19;183(7):E391-402. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101860. Epub 2011 Mar 28.