Pearlman D N, Branch L G, Ozminkowski R J, Experton B, Li Z
Brown University, Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 May;45(5):550-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb03086.x.
To assess whether transitions in health care expenditures differed over time by payor/provider type: Medicare fee-for-service (FFS), Medicaid-Medicare, and Medicare HMO.
Longitudinal study.
A large, nonprofit healthcare system in San Diego, California.
A total of 450 frail older people who responded to the baseline and follow-up surveys and who survived the 18-month study period.
Measures included three total expenditure categories for each 6-month period: low users (< $4000); medium users ($4000-$19,999); or high users ($20,000+). Seven conceptually meaningful expenditure trajectories over time were identified: (1) consistently low expenditures, (2) consistently medium expenditures, (3) consistently high expenditures, (4) decreasing expenditures, (5) increasing expenditures, (6) U-shaped expenditures, and (7) inverted U-shaped expenditures.
Logistic regression analyses showed that HMO enrollees were about twice as likely as Medicaid-Medicare beneficiaries to have consistently low expenditures, but no differences were found between the FFS and HMO groups on this trajectory. Other expenditure patterns showed no significant differences by payor/provider group. Significant interactions among payor/provider type, low/medium/ high expenditure status, and time were observed for inpatient hospital care, skilled nursing/rehabilitation care, and home health care.
This study illustrates the complexity of frail older people with respect to their health care expenditures and service use. Expanded efforts to control health care expenditures for frail older people should focus first on those who are dually-enrolled. In addition, because mean medical expenditures for high users enrolled in different payor/ provider groups were surprisingly similar, the data suggest that containing expenditures for individuals in the highest usage group ($20,000+) presents challenges for physicians practicing in an era of healthcare reform, regardless of payor/ provider setting.
评估医疗保健支出的转变是否因付款人/提供者类型(医疗保险按服务收费(FFS)、医疗补助 - 医疗保险和医疗保险健康维护组织(HMO))而异。
纵向研究。
加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥的一个大型非营利性医疗系统。
共有450名体弱的老年人,他们对基线和随访调查做出了回应,并在18个月的研究期内存活下来。
测量包括每6个月期间的三个总支出类别:低使用者(<$4000);中等使用者($4000 - $19,999);或高使用者($20,000以上)。确定了随着时间推移的七条概念上有意义的支出轨迹:(1)持续低支出,(2)持续中等支出,(3)持续高支出,(4)支出减少,(5)支出增加,(6)U形支出,和(7)倒U形支出。
逻辑回归分析表明,健康维护组织参保者的支出持续较低的可能性约为医疗补助 - 医疗保险受益人的两倍,但在这条轨迹上,按服务收费组和健康维护组织组之间未发现差异。其他支出模式在付款人/提供者组之间未显示出显著差异。在住院护理、专业护理/康复护理和家庭医疗护理方面,观察到付款人/提供者类型、低/中/高支出状态和时间之间存在显著交互作用。
本研究说明了体弱老年人在医疗保健支出和服务使用方面的复杂性。扩大控制体弱老年人医疗保健支出的努力应首先关注那些双重参保的人。此外,由于不同付款人/提供者组中高使用者的平均医疗支出惊人地相似,数据表明,在医疗改革时代,控制最高使用组($20,000以上)个人的支出对医生来说是一项挑战,无论付款人/提供者设置如何。