• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[肿瘤学指南评估]

[Evaluation of guidelines in oncology].

作者信息

Hölzel D, Engel J, Schmidt M

机构信息

Institut für medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.

出版信息

Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 1999 Jan;93(1):15-22.

PMID:10198973
Abstract

Several activities regarding guidelines have been developed in Germany within a short time. It is desirable especially in the field of oncology that procedures are stated as proven effective, proven ineffective, and possibly effective by using procedures of evidence based medicine. However, the low impact of guidelines on the medical practice has to be taken into account. The kind of errors of known deviations should decrease the expectations. This altogether should motivate for a closer look what really happens in the daily routine. It should also reflect the hospital's and physician's outcome and might provide hints to medical standards. Improving the still insufficient documentation, which may describe quality of care, can provide important features. This has to be remembered when undertaking activities regarding guidelines.

摘要

在德国,短时间内就开展了几项与指南相关的活动。尤其是在肿瘤学领域,希望通过循证医学的方法将程序明确表述为已证实有效、已证实无效以及可能有效。然而,必须考虑到指南对医疗实践的影响较小。已知偏差的错误类型应降低预期。总体而言,这应促使人们更仔细地审视日常实际发生的情况。它还应反映医院和医生的治疗结果,并可能为医疗标准提供线索。改善目前仍不充分的、可能描述护理质量的文档记录,可提供重要信息。在开展与指南相关的活动时必须牢记这一点。

相似文献

1
[Evaluation of guidelines in oncology].[肿瘤学指南评估]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 1999 Jan;93(1):15-22.
2
[Patient-oriented, treatment-accompanying documentation as a basis for evaluation with medical oncology as an example].[以患者为导向、伴随治疗的文档作为评估基础——以肿瘤内科为例]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2000 Oct;94(9):759-64.
3
[Development of standards and guidelines by the German Cancer Society].德国癌症协会制定标准和指南
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 1999 Jan;93(1):9-13.
4
Possibilities for transborder cooperation in breast cancer care in Europe: a comparative analysis regarding the content, quality and evidence use of breast cancer guidelines.欧洲乳腺癌护理跨境合作的可能性:关于乳腺癌指南的内容、质量和证据使用的比较分析
Breast. 2008 Oct;17(5):464-71. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2008.01.008. Epub 2008 May 1.
5
Practice variation: the Achilles' heel in quality cancer care.实践差异:优质癌症护理中的致命弱点。
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Sep 1;23(25):5881-2. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.034. Epub 2005 Aug 8.
6
A process for measuring the quality of cancer care: the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative.一种衡量癌症护理质量的方法:肿瘤学质量实践倡议。
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Sep 1;23(25):6233-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.948. Epub 2005 Aug 8.
7
[Regional implementation of guidelines as a lesson for cancer centers].[指南的区域实施:癌症中心的经验教训]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 1999 Jan;93(1):23-7.
8
[Previous experiences with evaluation of practice guidelines].[以往实践指南评估的经验]
Zentralbl Chir. 2000;125 Suppl 2:141-5.
9
Improving the quality of therapeutic reports of single cases and case series in oncology--criteria and checklist.提高肿瘤学单病例及病例系列治疗报告的质量——标准与核对清单
Altern Ther Health Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;10(5):68-72.
10
New standards and implications for improving the quality of supportive oncology practice.提高支持性肿瘤学实践质量的新标准及意义。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Aug 10;26(23):3824-31. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.7552.