Neuss Michael N, Desch Christopher E, McNiff Kristen K, Eisenberg Peter D, Gesme Dean H, Jacobson Joseph O, Jahanzeb Mohammad, Padberg Jennifer J, Rainey John M, Guo Jeff J, Simone Joseph V
Oncology Hematology Care, 4725 E Galbraith, Suite 320, Cincinnati, OH 45236, USA.
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Sep 1;23(25):6233-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.948. Epub 2005 Aug 8.
The Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) is a practice-based system of quality self-assessment sponsored by the participants and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). The process of quality evaluation, development of the pilot questionnaire, and preliminary results are reported.
Physicians from seven oncology groups developed medical record abstraction measures based on practice guidelines and consensus-supported indicators of quality care. Each practice completed two rounds of records review and received practice and aggregate results. Mean frequencies of responses for each indicator were compared among practices.
Participants universally, if informally, find QOPI helpful, and results show statistically significant variation among practices for several indicators, including assessing pain in patients close to death, documentation of informed consent for chemotherapy, and concordance with granulocytic and erythroid growth factor administration guidelines. Measures with universally high concordance include the use of serotonin antagonist antiemetics according to the ASCO guideline; the presence of a pathology report in the record; the use of chemotherapy flow sheets; and adherence to standard chemotherapy recommendations for patients with certain stages of breast, colon, and rectal cancer. Concordance with quality indicators significantly changed between survey rounds for several measures.
Pilot results indicate that the QOPI process provides a rapid and objective measurement of practice quality that allows comparisons among practices and over time. It also provides a mechanism for measuring concordance with published guidelines. Most importantly, it provides a tool for practice self-examination that can promote excellence in cancer care.
质量肿瘤学实践倡议(QOPI)是一个由参与者和美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)发起的基于实践的质量自我评估系统。本文报告了质量评估过程、试点问卷的制定以及初步结果。
来自七个肿瘤学小组的医生根据实践指南和质量护理的共识支持指标制定了病历摘要测量方法。每个实践机构完成了两轮记录审查,并收到了实践和汇总结果。对各指标的平均应答频率在各实践机构之间进行了比较。
参与者普遍(即使是非正式地)认为QOPI有帮助,结果显示在几个指标上各实践机构之间存在统计学上的显著差异,包括评估濒死患者的疼痛、化疗知情同意书的记录以及与粒细胞和红细胞生长因子给药指南的一致性。一致性普遍较高的指标包括按照ASCO指南使用5-羟色胺拮抗剂止吐药;病历中有病理报告;使用化疗流程表;以及对某些阶段乳腺癌、结肠癌和直肠癌患者遵循标准化化疗建议。对于几项测量指标,两轮调查之间与质量指标的一致性有显著变化。
试点结果表明,QOPI过程提供了一种快速、客观的实践质量测量方法,允许在不同实践机构之间以及随时间进行比较。它还提供了一种衡量与已发表指南一致性的机制。最重要的是,它提供了一种实践自我检查的工具,可以促进癌症护理的卓越水平。