Davis K
Commonwealth Fund, New York, NY 10021-2692, USA.
Health Serv Res. 1999 Apr;34(1 Pt 2):295-306.
This article suggests that further major changes in Medicare at this time are unwarranted. The enactment of the Balanced Budget Act (BBA) has eliminated the need for quick action to assure solvency of the Part A Trust Fund, which is projected to be in balance for at least ten years. It will take time to implement and assess the effects of the BBA. The uncertainties of future trends in the health sector and Medicare suggest a go-slow approach. Future reforms to finance health care as the baby boom generation retires should be guided by the goals of continuing to assure health and economic security to elderly and disabled beneficiaries, with particular attention to the financial burdens on lower-income beneficiaries and those with serious illnesses or chronic conditions. Employers are cutting back on retiree health coverage, and the appropriate contribution of employers will need to be addressed. The BBA included major provisions to expand Medicare managed care choices. Special attention will need to be given to how well these innovations work, their cost impact on Medicare, the extent to which beneficiaries are able to make informed choices, and whether risk selection among plans and between traditional Medicare and plans can be adequately addressed. Most of the savings of BBA came from tighter payment rates to managed care plans and fee-for-service providers; it is unclear whether these will lead to rates well below the private sector or whether further savings can be achieved by extending these changes beyond 2002.
本文认为,此时医疗保险制度进一步的重大变革并无必要。《平衡预算法案》(BBA)的颁布消除了迅速采取行动以确保A部分信托基金偿付能力的必要性,该基金预计至少十年内保持收支平衡。实施和评估《平衡预算法案》的影响需要时间。卫生部门和医疗保险未来趋势的不确定性表明应采取循序渐进的方式。随着婴儿潮一代退休,未来医疗保健融资改革应以继续确保老年和残疾受益人的健康和经济安全为目标,尤其要关注低收入受益人和患有严重疾病或慢性病患者的经济负担。雇主正在削减退休人员的医疗保险覆盖范围,雇主的适当缴费问题需要得到解决。《平衡预算法案》包含了扩大医疗保险管理式医疗选择的主要条款。需要特别关注这些创新措施的实施效果、它们对医疗保险的成本影响、受益人能够做出明智选择的程度,以及能否充分解决计划之间以及传统医疗保险与计划之间的风险选择问题。《平衡预算法案》的大部分节余来自对管理式医疗计划和按服务收费提供者收紧支付费率;目前尚不清楚这些费率是否会远低于私营部门,或者通过将这些变革延续到2002年以后是否还能实现进一步节余。