Hammel J, Royeen C B, Bagatell N, Chandler B, Jensen G, Loveland J, Stone G
Occupational Therapy/Disability and Human Development, University of Illinois at Chicago 60612, USA.
Am J Occup Ther. 1999 Mar-Apr;53(2):199-206. doi: 10.5014/ajot.53.2.199.
Problem-based learning (PBL) is increasingly being used within health care professional educational programs to develop critical thinking skills via a learner-centered approach. However, few studies have evaluated the effect of participation in a PBL-centered curriculum on occupational therapy knowledge and skill development over time from the perspective of the students involved. This study examined student evaluations of the first three class cohorts participating in a PBL-based curriculum.
A participatory action design study involving qualitative, student-led focus groups was conducted with 154 students across 2 years of the education program. Fourteen focus groups were audiotaped, and those audiotapes were transcribed by an outside expert, followed by two levels of analysis by program faculty members and a member check by student participants.
Themes that emerged from the data analysis related to (a) defining elements of PBL, (b) the role of students and faculty members, (c) learning strategies used by students in a PBL versus traditional education program, (d) the challenges of a PBL approach, and (e) PBL's relationship to clinical reasoning and occupational therapy practice.
Students perceived that a PBL approach adopted consistently across the curriculum contributed to the development of information management, critical reasoning, communication, and team-building skills; however, identified challenges were time and role management, information access, instructor versus PBL expectations and practices, and coping with the ambiguity of knowledge and reasoning.
基于问题的学习(PBL)越来越多地应用于医疗保健专业教育项目中,通过以学习者为中心的方法培养批判性思维技能。然而,从参与学生的角度来看,很少有研究评估参与以PBL为中心的课程对职业治疗知识和技能发展的长期影响。本研究考察了参与基于PBL课程的前三届班级学生的评价。
采用参与式行动设计研究,涉及定性的、由学生主导的焦点小组,对教育项目两年内的154名学生进行了研究。对14个焦点小组进行了录音,由外部专家转录这些录音,随后项目教员进行了两级分析,并由学生参与者进行了成员核对。
数据分析中出现的主题包括:(a)PBL的定义要素;(b)学生和教员的角色;(c)学生在PBL与传统教育项目中使用的学习策略;(d)PBL方法的挑战;(e)PBL与临床推理和职业治疗实践的关系。
学生认为在整个课程中持续采用PBL方法有助于信息管理、批判性推理、沟通和团队建设技能的发展;然而,确定的挑战是时间和角色管理、信息获取、教师与PBL的期望和实践,以及应对知识和推理的模糊性。