Alloway C E, Ogilvie R D, Shapiro C M
Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada.
Sleep. 1999 Mar 15;22(2):191-203. doi: 10.1093/sleep/22.2.191.
The sleep-onset period of 10 drug-free patients with narcolepsy-cataplexy and 10 normals matched for age and gender was investigated using the multiple sleep latency test to elicit episodes of intentional sleep onset. Spectral analyses were calculated for delta, theta, alpha, sigma, and beta frequencies using 5-second epochs beginning at lights-out and continuing until the first 2 minutes of stage 2 or REM sleep were reached, or until 20 minutes had elapsed. The sleep-onset period was divided into quartiles, and mean root mean square (RMS) amplitude within each quartile was calculated. Mean delta amplitude was significantly higher across the sleep-onset period of narcoleptic REM naps and narcoleptic stage 2 naps compared to the sleep-onset period of normal stage 2 naps or normal stage 1 naps. Mean theta amplitude was significantly higher for narcoleptic REM naps compared to normal stage 1 naps, and tended to be higher for narcoleptic stage 2 naps compared to normal stage 1 naps. Mean alpha amplitude was significantly lower for narcoleptic REM naps and narcoleptic stage 2 naps compared to normal naps containing just stage 1. Mean sigma amplitude was significantly lower for narcoleptic REM naps compared to normal stage 1 naps, and tended to be lower for narcoleptic REM naps compared to normal stage 2 naps. Mean beta amplitude did not differ between the narcoleptic and normal sleep-onset process. These findings support the existence of electrophysiologic differences within the microstructure of the process of sleep entry in narcoleptics and normals.
采用多次睡眠潜伏期试验诱发有意入睡发作,对10例发作性睡病-猝倒症无药物治疗患者及10例年龄和性别匹配的正常人的入睡期进行了研究。使用从熄灯开始并持续到达到第二阶段或快速眼动睡眠的前2分钟,或直到20分钟过去的5秒时段,计算δ、θ、α、σ和β频率的频谱分析。将入睡期分为四分位数,并计算每个四分位数内的平均均方根(RMS)振幅。与正常第二阶段午睡或正常第一阶段午睡的入睡期相比,发作性睡病快速眼动午睡和发作性睡病第二阶段午睡的入睡期平均δ振幅显著更高。与正常第一阶段午睡相比,发作性睡病快速眼动午睡的平均θ振幅显著更高,与正常第一阶段午睡相比,发作性睡病第二阶段午睡的平均θ振幅也有升高趋势。与仅包含第一阶段的正常午睡相比,发作性睡病快速眼动午睡和发作性睡病第二阶段午睡的平均α振幅显著更低。与正常第一阶段午睡相比,发作性睡病快速眼动午睡的平均σ振幅显著更低,与正常第二阶段午睡相比,发作性睡病快速眼动午睡的平均σ振幅也有降低趋势。发作性睡病和正常入睡过程之间的平均β振幅没有差异。这些发现支持发作性睡病患者和正常人在睡眠进入过程的微观结构中存在电生理差异。