• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用一种新方法测量持续性非卧床腹膜透析处方依从性。

Measurement of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis prescription adherence using a novel approach.

作者信息

Sevick M A, Levine D W, Burkart J M, Rocco M V, Keith J, Cohen S J

机构信息

Department of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157-1063, USA.

出版信息

Perit Dial Int. 1999 Jan-Feb;19(1):23-30.

PMID:10201337
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to test a novel approach to monitoring the adherence of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients to their dialysis prescription.

DESIGN

A descriptive observational study was done in which exchange behaviors were monitored over a 2-week period of time.

SETTING

Patients were recruited from an outpatient dialysis center.

PARTICIPANTS

A convenience sample of patients undergoing CAPD at Piedmont Dialysis Center in Winston-Salem, North Carolina was recruited for the study. Of 31 CAPD patients, 20 (64.5%) agreed to participate.

MEASURES

Adherence of CAPD patients to their dialysis prescription was monitored using daily logs and an electronic monitoring device (the Medication Event Monitoring System, or MEMS; APREX, Menlo Park, California, U.S.A.). Patients recorded in their logs their exchange activities during the 2-week observation period. Concurrently, patients were instructed to deposit the pull tab from their dialysate bag into a MEMS bottle immediately after performing each exchange. The MEMS bottle was closed with a cap containing a computer chip that recorded the date and time each time the bottle was opened.

RESULTS

One individual's MEMS device malfunctioned and thus the data presented in this report are based upon the remaining 19 patients. A significant discrepancy was found between log data and MEMS data, with MEMS data indicating a greater number and percentage of missed exchanges. MEMS data indicated that some patients concentrated their exchange activities during the day, with shortened dwell times between exchanges. Three indices were developed for this study: a measure of the average time spent in noncompliance, and indices of consistency in the timing of exchanges within and between days. Patients who were defined as consistent had lower scores on the noncompliance index compared to patients defined as inconsistent (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

This study describes a methodology that may be useful in assessing adherence to the peritoneal dialysis regimen. Of particular significance is the ability to assess the timing of exchanges over the course of a day. Clinical implications are limited due to issues of data reliability and validity, the short-term nature of the study, the small sample, and the fact that clinical outcomes were not considered in this methodology study. Additional research is needed to further develop this data-collection approach.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在测试一种监测持续性非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)患者透析处方依从性的新方法。

设计

进行了一项描述性观察研究,在两周时间内监测交换行为。

地点

患者从门诊透析中心招募。

参与者

从北卡罗来纳州温斯顿 - 塞勒姆的皮埃蒙特透析中心接受CAPD治疗的患者中选取便利样本进行研究。31名CAPD患者中,20名(64.5%)同意参与。

措施

使用每日日志和电子监测设备(药物事件监测系统,即MEMS;美国加利福尼亚州门洛帕克的APREX公司)监测CAPD患者对透析处方的依从性。患者在日志中记录两周观察期内的交换活动。同时,患者被指示在每次交换后立即将透析液袋的拉环放入MEMS瓶中。MEMS瓶用带有计算机芯片的瓶盖封闭,该芯片记录每次瓶子打开的日期和时间。

结果

一名患者的MEMS设备出现故障,因此本报告中的数据基于其余19名患者。日志数据和MEMS数据之间存在显著差异,MEMS数据显示错过交换的次数和百分比更高。MEMS数据表明,一些患者在白天集中进行交换活动,交换之间的驻留时间缩短。本研究开发了三个指标:一个衡量不依从平均时间的指标,以及日内和日间交换时间一致性的指标。被定义为一致的患者与被定义为不一致的患者相比,不依从指数得分更低(p = 0.015)。

结论

本研究描述了一种可能有助于评估腹膜透析方案依从性的方法。特别重要的是能够评估一天中交换的时间。由于数据可靠性和有效性问题、研究的短期性质、样本量小以及该方法学研究未考虑临床结果,临床意义有限。需要进一步研究以进一步开发这种数据收集方法。

相似文献

1
Measurement of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis prescription adherence using a novel approach.采用一种新方法测量持续性非卧床腹膜透析处方依从性。
Perit Dial Int. 1999 Jan-Feb;19(1):23-30.
2
Three Versus 4 Daily Exchanges and Residual Kidney Function Decline in Incident CAPD Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.每日三次与每日四次交换与新发生 CAPD 患者的残余肾功能下降:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2017 Apr;69(4):506-513. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.08.019. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
3
Compliance in CAPD and CCPD patients as measured by supply inventories during home visits.通过家访期间的供应库存衡量持续性非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)和持续性循环腹膜透析(CCPD)患者的依从性。
Am J Kidney Dis. 1998 Jan;31(1):101-7. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.1998.v31.pm9428459.
4
Changes in water transport across the peritoneum during treatment with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in selected patients with and without peritonitis.在部分伴有或不伴有腹膜炎的患者进行持续性非卧床腹膜透析治疗期间,腹膜水转运的变化。
Perit Dial Int. 2004 Nov-Dec;24(6):571-9.
5
Measuring compliance with prescribed exchanges in CAPD and CCPD patients.测量持续性非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)和持续性循环腹膜透析(CCPD)患者对规定透析交换的依从性。
Perit Dial Int. 1997 Jul-Aug;17(4):338-42.
6
Dialysate dumping: a novel cause of inadequate dialysis in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients.透析液渗漏:持续性非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)患者透析不充分的新原因。
Perit Dial Int. 1989;9(4):319-20.
7
Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and automated peritoneal dialysis: are there differences in outcome?持续非卧床腹膜透析与自动化腹膜透析:结局有差异吗?
Contrib Nephrol. 2009;163:292-299. doi: 10.1159/000223813. Epub 2009 Jun 3.
8
Comparison of two different Kt/V methods in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients.两种不同Kt/V方法在持续性非卧床腹膜透析患者中的比较。
Perit Dial Int. 1999;19 Suppl 2:S514-6.
9
An elevated ratio of measured to predicted creatinine production in CAPD patients is not a sensitive predictor of noncompliance with the dialysis prescription.持续性非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)患者实测肌酐生成与预测肌酐生成的比率升高,并非透析处方依从性不佳的敏感预测指标。
Perit Dial Int. 1996 Mar-Apr;16(2):142-6.
10
A multicenter study of noncompliance with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis exchanges in US and Canadian patients.一项针对美国和加拿大患者不遵守持续性非卧床腹膜透析换液规定情况的多中心研究。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2000 Mar;35(3):506-14. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(00)70205-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Is regular in-person recall superior to non-regular in-person recall in clinical outcomes among new patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis.在接受腹膜透析的新患者中,定期面对面随访是否优于非定期面对面随访对临床结局的影响。
Ren Fail. 2022 Dec;44(1):2010-2018. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2022.2145972.
2
Non-adherence in patients on peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review.腹膜透析患者的不依从性:一项系统评价。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 25;9(2):e89001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089001. eCollection 2014.
3
Adherence of pediatric patients to automated peritoneal dialysis.
儿科患者对自动化腹膜透析的依从性。
Pediatr Nephrol. 2011 May;26(5):789-93. doi: 10.1007/s00467-011-1792-2. Epub 2011 Feb 25.