• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肉芽肿性前列腺炎的经直肠超声和磁共振成像表现及其与癌的鉴别诊断

The transrectal ultrasound and MRI appearances of granulomatous prostatitis and its differentiation from carcinoma.

作者信息

Naik K S, Carey B M

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Cookridge Hospital, West Yorkshire, UK.

出版信息

Clin Radiol. 1999 Mar;54(3):173-5. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(99)91009-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0009-9260(99)91009-7
PMID:10201866
Abstract

AIMS AND METHODS

Granulomatous prostatitis is a benign inflammatory condition of the prostate which can be mistaken for prostatic carcinoma both clinically and on ultrasound, but is distinguishable histologically. The transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) appearances of 10 patients with histologically confirmed granulomatous prostatitis were evaluated to try and identify any correlation between the two techniques or any specific features on MRI to help distinguish it from carcinoma. Clinical findings and serum prostatic specific antigen (PSA) levels were also evaluated.

RESULTS

In five patients, both TRUS and MRI were concordant, showing only changes of benign prostatic hypertrophy (three patients) or showing no abnormality (two patients). In a further three patients, both TRUS and MRI were abnormal, with appearances suggestive of carcinoma. One of these patients had tuberculous prostatitis and had a past history of tuberculosis. In the remaining two patients, there was a discrepancy between TRUS and MRI findings, carcinoma being suspected on TRUS in one with a normal MRI, and carcinoma suspected on MRI in the other with a normal TRUS.

CONCLUSION

There is no pattern of clinical, biochemical, ultrasound or MRI findings that allows a specific diagnosis of granulomatous prostatitis to be made, or differentiation from prostatic carcinoma.

摘要

目的与方法

肉芽肿性前列腺炎是前列腺的一种良性炎症性疾病,在临床和超声检查中都可能被误诊为前列腺癌,但在组织学上是可区分的。对10例经组织学确诊为肉芽肿性前列腺炎患者的经直肠超声(TRUS)和磁共振成像(MRI)表现进行评估,以试图确定这两种技术之间的任何相关性,或MRI上有助于将其与癌相鉴别的任何特定特征。还对临床发现和血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平进行了评估。

结果

5例患者中,TRUS和MRI结果一致,仅显示良性前列腺增生的改变(3例)或无异常(2例)。另外3例患者中,TRUS和MRI均异常,表现提示为癌。其中1例患者患有结核性前列腺炎,有肺结核病史。其余2例患者中,TRUS和MRI结果存在差异,1例TRUS怀疑为癌但MRI正常,另1例MRI怀疑为癌但TRUS正常。

结论

不存在能够做出肉芽肿性前列腺炎的特异性诊断或与前列腺癌进行鉴别的临床、生化、超声或MRI表现模式。

相似文献

1
The transrectal ultrasound and MRI appearances of granulomatous prostatitis and its differentiation from carcinoma.肉芽肿性前列腺炎的经直肠超声和磁共振成像表现及其与癌的鉴别诊断
Clin Radiol. 1999 Mar;54(3):173-5. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(99)91009-7.
2
A rare case of granulomatous prostatitis caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
J Clin Ultrasound. 2007 Jan;35(1):58-61. doi: 10.1002/jcu.20251.
3
Transrectal ultrasound appearances of granulomatous prostatitis.肉芽肿性前列腺炎的经直肠超声表现。
Clin Radiol. 1993 Mar;47(3):174-6. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)81156-0.
4
Nonspecific granulomatous prostatitis.非特异性肉芽肿性前列腺炎
Ultraschall Med. 2005 Jun;26(3):203-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-858072.
5
Transrectal ultrasound appearance of granulomatous prostatitis.
J Ultrasound Med. 1990 Dec;9(12):677-80. doi: 10.7863/jum.1990.9.12.677.
6
Detection of prostatic carcinoma: the role of TRUS, TRUS guided biopsy, digital rectal examination, PSA and PSA density.前列腺癌的检测:超声引导下经直肠超声检查(TRUS)、TRUS引导下活检、直肠指检、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)及PSA密度的作用
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2001 Dec;20(4):473-80.
7
Xanthogranulomatous prostatitis: multiparametric MRI appearances.黄色肉芽肿性前列腺炎:多参数磁共振成像表现
Clin Imaging. 2014 Sep-Oct;38(5):755-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2014.03.008. Epub 2014 Mar 22.
8
Correlation of prostate-specific antigen and prostate-specific antigen density with outcome of prostate biopsy.前列腺特异性抗原及前列腺特异性抗原密度与前列腺活检结果的相关性
Urology. 1994 Feb;43(2):191-6. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(94)90043-4.
9
[Non-specific granulomatous prostatitis. Relationship and differential diagnosis with prostatic cancer].[非特异性肉芽肿性前列腺炎。与前列腺癌的关系及鉴别诊断]
Actas Urol Esp. 1994 Apr;18(4):287-90.
10
Granulomatous prostatitis and poorly differentiated prostate carcinoma. Their distinction with the use of immunohistochemical methods.肉芽肿性前列腺炎与低分化前列腺癌。应用免疫组化方法对它们进行鉴别。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1991 Mar;95(3):330-4. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/95.3.330.

引用本文的文献

1
Xanthogranulomatous prostatitis mimicking prostatic adenocarcinoma: a diagnostic dilemma.酷似前列腺腺癌的黄色肉芽肿性前列腺炎:诊断难题
BMJ Case Rep. 2019 Nov 27;12(11):e231945. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2019-231945.
2
Multiparametric MRI appearances of primary granulomatous prostatitis.原发性肉芽肿性前列腺炎的多参数磁共振成像表现
Br J Radiol. 2019 Jun;92(1098):20180075. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180075. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
3
Xanthogranulomatous prostatitis with prostato-rectal fistula: a case report and review of the literature.伴有前列腺直肠瘘的黄色肉芽肿性前列腺炎:一例报告并文献复习
Res Rep Urol. 2016 Sep 16;8:165-168. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S110658. eCollection 2016.
4
Radiologic presentation of chronic granulomatous prostatitis mimicking locally advanced prostate adenocarcinoma.慢性肉芽肿性前列腺炎酷似局部进展性前列腺腺癌的放射学表现。
Radiol Case Rep. 2016 Mar 16;11(2):78-82. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2016.02.009. eCollection 2016 Jun.
5
Multiphase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging features of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-induced granulomatous prostatitis in five patients.5例卡介苗诱导的肉芽肿性前列腺炎的多期对比增强磁共振成像特征
Korean J Radiol. 2015 Mar-Apr;16(2):342-8. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.2.342. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
6
Targeted biopsy based on ADC map in the detection and localization of prostate cancer: a feasibility study.基于 ADC 图的靶向活检在前列腺癌的检测和定位中的可行性研究。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 May;37(5):1168-77. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23908. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
7
Determination of the cutoff level of apparent diffusion coefficient values for detection of prostate cancer.确定表观扩散系数值的截断水平以检测前列腺癌。
Jpn J Radiol. 2011 Aug;29(7):488-94. doi: 10.1007/s11604-011-0586-6. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
8
Xanthogranulomatous prostatitis: a mimic of carcinoma of prostate.黄色肉芽肿性前列腺炎:一种前列腺癌的模仿者。
World J Surg Oncol. 2006 Jun 5;4:30. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-4-30.