• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定表观扩散系数值的截断水平以检测前列腺癌。

Determination of the cutoff level of apparent diffusion coefficient values for detection of prostate cancer.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, 1-1-1 Miwa, Kurashiki 710-8602, Japan.

出版信息

Jpn J Radiol. 2011 Aug;29(7):488-94. doi: 10.1007/s11604-011-0586-6. Epub 2011 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1007/s11604-011-0586-6
PMID:21882091
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the cutoff level of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for diagnosing prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 45 consecutive patients with prostate cancer who underwent diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with ADC maps before radical prostatectomy were included in this retrospective study. MRI findings were correlated retrospectively with histopathological results of surgical specimens. Comparisons of ADC values between cancer and noncancer areas were performed with the two-tailed unequal variance t-test. The cutoff ADC level was determined in a way to achieve the best accuracy for detecting prostate cancer.

RESULTS

The mean ADC value of all the cancer lesions (n =60) was 1.04 ± 0.31 (×10(-3) mm(2)/s). In the peripheral zone, the mean ADC values of cancer lesions and noncancer areas were 1.07 ± 0.35 and 1.94 ± 0.31, respectively (P < 0.001). In the transition zone, the mean ADC values of cancer lesions and noncancer areas were 1.00 ± 0.22 and 1.56 ± 0.14, respectively (P<0.001). The cutoff level for the ADC value was determined to be 1.35×10(-3) mm(2)/s. It provided sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 88%, 96%, and 93%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The cutoff ADC level determined on the basis of the results obtained from radical prostatectomy specimens can help differentiate malignant from nonmalignant lesions.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定表观扩散系数(ADC)值用于诊断前列腺癌的截断值。

材料与方法

回顾性分析 45 例经根治性前列腺切除术前行扩散加权磁共振成像(MRI)并获得 ADC 图的前列腺癌患者的资料。MRI 结果与手术标本的组织病理学结果进行回顾性比较。采用双尾不等方差 t 检验比较癌区和非癌区 ADC 值的差异。通过确定达到最佳诊断准确性的 ADC 截断值。

结果

所有癌灶(n = 60)的平均 ADC 值为 1.04 ± 0.31(×10(-3) mm(2)/s)。在周边区,癌灶和非癌区的平均 ADC 值分别为 1.07 ± 0.35 和 1.94 ± 0.31(P < 0.001)。在移行区,癌灶和非癌区的平均 ADC 值分别为 1.00 ± 0.22 和 1.56 ± 0.14(P < 0.001)。ADC 值的截断水平确定为 1.35×10(-3) mm(2)/s。它提供了 88%、96%和 93%的敏感性、特异性和准确性。

结论

基于根治性前列腺切除术后标本得出的 ADC 截断值有助于鉴别良恶性病变。

相似文献

1
Determination of the cutoff level of apparent diffusion coefficient values for detection of prostate cancer.确定表观扩散系数值的截断水平以检测前列腺癌。
Jpn J Radiol. 2011 Aug;29(7):488-94. doi: 10.1007/s11604-011-0586-6. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
2
Prospective Inclusion of Apparent Diffusion Coefficients in Multiparametric Prostate MRI Structured Reports: Discrimination of Clinically Insignificant and Significant Cancers.前瞻性纳入表观扩散系数于多参数前列腺 MRI 结构化报告中:鉴别临床无意义和有意义的肿瘤。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Jan;212(1):109-116. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.19937. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
3
Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.扩散峰度成像与标准扩散成像在周围区前列腺癌检测及分级中的评估
Invest Radiol. 2015 Aug;50(8):483-9. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000155.
4
Prostate cancer: utility of diffusion-weighted imaging as a marker of side-specific risk of extracapsular extension.前列腺癌:扩散加权成像作为包膜外侵犯侧特异性风险标志物的效用。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Aug;38(2):312-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23972. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
5
Apparent diffusion coefficient value and ratio as noninvasive potential biomarkers to predict prostate cancer grading: comparison with prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen.表观扩散系数值和比值作为预测前列腺癌分级的非侵入性潜在生物标志物:与前列腺活检和根治性前列腺切除术标本的比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Mar;204(3):550-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13146.
6
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the prostate transition zone: histopathological validation using magnetic resonance-guided biopsy specimens.磁共振弥散加权成像在前列腺移行区:利用磁共振引导活检标本的组织病理学验证。
Invest Radiol. 2013 Oct;48(10):693-701. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31828eeaf9.
7
What is the optimal b value in diffusion-weighted MR imaging to depict prostate cancer at 3T?在 3T 磁共振弥散加权成像中,描述前列腺癌的最佳 b 值是多少?
Eur Radiol. 2012 Mar;22(3):703-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2298-9. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
8
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values of the Benign Central Zone of the Prostate: Comparison With Low- and High-Grade Prostate Cancer.前列腺良性中央区的表观扩散系数值:与低级别和高级别前列腺癌的比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Aug;205(2):331-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.14221.
9
Differentiation of prostate cancer lesions with high and with low Gleason score by diffusion-weighted MRI.通过扩散加权磁共振成像鉴别高Gleason评分和低Gleason评分的前列腺癌病灶。
Eur Radiol. 2017 Apr;27(4):1547-1555. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4449-5. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
10
Diffusion-weighted endorectal MR imaging at 3 T for prostate cancer: tumor detection and assessment of aggressiveness.3T 直肠内磁共振弥散加权成像在前列腺癌中的应用:肿瘤检测及侵袭性评估。
Radiology. 2011 Jun;259(3):775-84. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11102066. Epub 2011 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Emerging MR methods for improved diagnosis of prostate cancer by multiparametric MRI.新兴的磁共振方法通过多参数 MRI 提高前列腺癌的诊断准确性。
MAGMA. 2022 Aug;35(4):587-608. doi: 10.1007/s10334-022-01031-5. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
2
Prostate cancer GTV delineation with biparametric MRI and Ga-PSMA-PET: comparison of expert contours and semi-automated methods.基于双参数 MRI 和 Ga-PSMA-PET 的前列腺癌 GTV 勾画:专家勾画与半自动勾画方法的比较。
Br J Radiol. 2021 Mar 1;94(1119):20201174. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20201174. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
3
Utility of quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient measurements and normalized apparent diffusion coefficient ratios in the diagnosis of clinically significant peripheral zone prostate cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Prostate tumor volume measurement with combined T2-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted MR: correlation with pathologic tumor volume.联合T2加权成像和扩散加权磁共振成像测量前列腺肿瘤体积:与病理肿瘤体积的相关性
Radiology. 2009 Aug;252(2):449-57. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2523081423.
2
Prostate cancer detection with multi-parametric MRI: logistic regression analysis of quantitative T2, diffusion-weighted imaging, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.多参数磁共振成像检测前列腺癌:定量T2、扩散加权成像和动态对比增强磁共振成像的逻辑回归分析
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Aug;30(2):327-34. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21824.
3
A new chromogenic assay (HemosIL ThromboPath) is sensitive to major prothrombotic risk factors affecting the protein C pathway. Results of a multicenter study.
定量表观扩散系数测量和标准化表观扩散系数比在诊断临床上有意义的外周带前列腺癌中的应用。
Br J Radiol. 2018 Jul;91(1088):20180091. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180091. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
4
Diagnostic accuracy of DWI in patients with ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis.弥散加权成像在卵巢癌患者中的诊断准确性:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 May;96(19):e6659. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006659.
5
Predicting biochemical recurrence in patients with high-risk prostate cancer using the apparent diffusion coefficient of magnetic resonance imaging.利用磁共振成像的表观扩散系数预测高危前列腺癌患者的生化复发。
Investig Clin Urol. 2017 Jan;58(1):12-19. doi: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.1.12. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
6
Multivariate modelling of prostate cancer combining magnetic resonance derived T2, diffusion, dynamic contrast-enhanced and spectroscopic parameters.结合磁共振 T2、弥散、动态对比增强和波谱参数对前列腺癌进行多变量建模。
Eur Radiol. 2015 May;25(5):1247-56. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3479-0. Epub 2015 Mar 7.
7
Evaluation of the normal-to-diseased apparent diffusion coefficient ratio as an indicator of prostate cancer aggressiveness.评估正常至病变表观扩散系数比作为前列腺癌侵袭性的指标。
BMC Med Imaging. 2014 May 10;14:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2342-14-15.
8
The value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.扩散加权成像在前列腺癌检测中的价值:一项荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2014 Aug;24(8):1929-41. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3201-2. Epub 2014 May 28.
9
Role of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating benign and malignant pediatric abdominal tumors.扩散加权成像在鉴别儿童腹部良恶性肿瘤中的作用。
Pediatr Radiol. 2013 Jul;43(7):836-45. doi: 10.1007/s00247-013-2626-0. Epub 2013 May 12.
10
Targeted biopsy based on ADC map in the detection and localization of prostate cancer: a feasibility study.基于 ADC 图的靶向活检在前列腺癌的检测和定位中的可行性研究。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 May;37(5):1168-77. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23908. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
一种新的显色测定法(HemosIL血栓形成途径检测)对影响蛋白C途径的主要血栓形成前危险因素敏感。一项多中心研究的结果。
Thromb Res. 2009 May;124(1):137-43. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2008.11.017. Epub 2009 Jan 20.
4
Prostate cancer: apparent diffusion coefficient map with T2-weighted images for detection--a multireader study.前列腺癌:利用T2加权图像的表观扩散系数图进行检测——一项多阅片者研究
Radiology. 2009 Jan;250(1):145-51. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2501080207. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
5
Intermixed normal tissue within prostate cancer: effect on MR imaging measurements of apparent diffusion coefficient and T2--sparse versus dense cancers.前列腺癌内的混杂正常组织:对表观扩散系数和T2加权成像测量的影响——稀疏癌与致密癌的比较
Radiology. 2008 Dec;249(3):900-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2493080236.
6
Apparent diffusion coefficient values in peripheral and transition zones of the prostate: comparison between normal and malignant prostatic tissues and correlation with histologic grade.前列腺外周带和移行带的表观扩散系数值:正常与恶性前列腺组织的比较及其与组织学分级的相关性
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Sep;28(3):720-6. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21503.
7
High b-value diffusion-weighted imaging in normal and malignant peripheral zone tissue of the prostate: effect of signal-to-noise ratio.高b值扩散加权成像在前列腺正常及恶性外周带组织中的应用:信噪比的影响
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2008;7(2):93-9. doi: 10.2463/mrms.7.93.
8
Prostate cancer: relationships between postbiopsy hemorrhage and tumor detectability at MR diagnosis.前列腺癌:活检后出血与磁共振成像诊断时肿瘤可检测性之间的关系
Radiology. 2008 Aug;248(2):531-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2482070157. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
9
Usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient map in diagnosing prostate carcinoma: correlation with stepwise histopathology.表观扩散系数图在前列腺癌诊断中的应用:与逐步组织病理学的相关性
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Jan;27(1):132-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21181.
10
Prostate cancer: accurate determination of extracapsular extension with high-spatial-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted MR imaging--initial results.前列腺癌:利用高空间分辨率动态对比增强和T2加权磁共振成像准确判定包膜外侵犯——初步结果
Radiology. 2007 Oct;245(1):176-85. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2451061502. Epub 2007 Aug 23.