慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中,通过定量吸入器加储雾罐、干粉吸入器和喷射雾化器递送的沙丁胺醇的支气管扩张作用比较。
Comparison of the bronchodilator effects of salbutamol delivered via a metered-dose inhaler with spacer, a dry-powder inhaler, and a jet nebulizer in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
作者信息
Ikeda A, Nishimura K, Koyama H, Tsukino M, Hajiro T, Mishima M, Izumi T
机构信息
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
出版信息
Respiration. 1999;66(2):119-23. doi: 10.1159/000029352.
The aim of this study was to compare the bronchodilator effects of salbutamol delivered via three different devices: a dry-powder inhaler (DPI), a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) with a large-volume spacer and a jet nebulizer (NEB) in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Ten male patients with stable COPD [age: 67.2 +/- 3.8 years, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1): 1.56 +/- 0.32 liters] were studied in a randomized, double-blind and crossover manner. Each patient received 200 or 1, 000 microg salbutamol via an MDI with an InspirEaseTM spacer, a RotahalerTM, or a DeVilbiss 646(TM) nebulizer (NEB), or matching placebo on 7 separate days. Spirometry was performed before and 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 240 min after inhalation. With the 200- microg dose, only DPI produced a small but greater response in maximum FEV1 and in area under the time-response curve (AUC-FEV1) compared with placebo. With the 1,000- microg dose, DPI and MDI produced equally greater improvements in both maximum FEV1 and AUC-FEV1 than NEB. An equal bronchodilating effect can be obtained using either DPI or MDI with a spacer device, whereas the NEB was less effective when the same dose was administered.
本研究旨在比较三种不同装置递送沙丁胺醇对稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的支气管扩张作用,这三种装置分别为干粉吸入器(DPI)、带大容量储雾罐的定量吸入器(MDI)和喷射雾化器(NEB)。10例稳定期COPD男性患者[年龄:67.2±3.8岁,第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1):1.56±0.32升]参与了一项随机、双盲、交叉研究。每位患者在7个不同日期分别通过带有InspirEaseTM储雾罐的MDI、RotahalerTM或德维比斯646TM雾化器(NEB)接受200或1000微克沙丁胺醇,或匹配的安慰剂。在吸入前以及吸入后15、30、60、90、120和240分钟进行肺功能测定。使用200微克剂量时,与安慰剂相比,只有DPI在最大FEV1和时间-反应曲线下面积(AUC-FEV1)方面产生了小但更大的反应。使用1000微克剂量时,DPI和MDI在最大FEV1和AUC-FEV1方面的改善均比NEB更大。使用DPI或带储雾罐装置的MDI可获得同等的支气管扩张效果,而给予相同剂量时NEB效果较差。