Mendels J, Kiev A, Fabre L F
Therapeutic Services Inc., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Depress Anxiety. 1999;9(2):54-60.
This multicenter study compared the efficacy and safety of citalopram and placebo in a population of moderately to severely depressed patients with melancholia. This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study compared citalopram (flexible dose; 20-80 mg/day) with placebo in 180 psychiatric outpatients with a DSM-III diagnosis of major depression or bipolar disorder, depressed, who also met DSM-III criteria for melancholia. Following a 1-week placebo washout period, patients meeting study entry criteria were randomized to 4 weeks of double-blind treatment with either citalopram or placebo. Efficacy measures included the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Scale, and the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale. Patients treated with citalopram showed significantly greater improvement at endpoint than placebo patients on the HAM-D, CGI, and Zung scales. On the HAM-D, citalopram patients exhibited significantly greater improvement than placebo patients after 1 week of double-blind treatment and at all subsequent study visits. Endpoint analyses of the HAM-D subscales demonstrated that citalopram produced significant improvement of the psychomotor retardation, cognitive disturbance, sleep disturbance, and melancholia symptom clusters. Nausea, dry mouth, somnolence, dizziness, and increased sweating were reported at higher rates by citalopram-treated patients than by placebo-treated patients, but there were no significant citalopram-placebo differences in the incidence of activation (e.g., anxiety, nervousness, insomnia) or sexual dysfunction. Analysis of electrocardiograms, vital signs, and laboratory tests did not reveal any clinically significant effects of citalopram treatment. The results of this study indicate that citalopram is safe and effective in the treatment of depressed patients with melancholia, and is associated with a favorable side effect profile and a potentially rapid onset of action.
这项多中心研究比较了西酞普兰与安慰剂对中度至重度抑郁伴忧郁症患者的疗效和安全性。这项随机、双盲、平行组研究将西酞普兰(灵活剂量;20 - 80毫克/天)与安慰剂进行比较,研究对象为180名符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM - III)中重度抑郁症或双相情感障碍抑郁发作诊断标准且符合忧郁症DSM - III标准的精神科门诊患者。在为期1周的安慰剂洗脱期后,符合研究入组标准的患者被随机分配接受为期4周的西酞普兰或安慰剂双盲治疗。疗效评估指标包括汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM - D)、临床总体印象量表(CGI)和zung自评抑郁量表。在HAM - D、CGI和zung量表上,接受西酞普兰治疗的患者在研究终点时的改善程度显著高于安慰剂组患者。在HAM - D量表上,西酞普兰组患者在双盲治疗1周后及随后所有研究访视时的改善程度均显著高于安慰剂组患者。对HAM - D分量表的终点分析表明,西酞普兰显著改善了精神运动迟缓、认知障碍、睡眠障碍和忧郁症症状群。与安慰剂组患者相比,接受西酞普兰治疗的患者报告恶心、口干、嗜睡、头晕和出汗增多的发生率更高,但在激越(如焦虑、紧张、失眠)或性功能障碍的发生率上,西酞普兰组与安慰剂组之间无显著差异。心电图、生命体征和实验室检查分析未发现西酞普兰治疗有任何具有临床意义的影响。这项研究结果表明,西酞普兰在治疗伴有忧郁症的抑郁症患者时安全有效,且副作用较小,起效可能较快。