de Pascalis V
University of Rome.
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1999 Apr;47(2):117-43. doi: 10.1080/00207149908410026.
This article reviews and summarizes electroencephalographic (EEG)-based research on physiological and cognitive indicators of hypnotic responding and hypnotic susceptibility, with special attention to the author's programmatic research in this area. Evidence that differences in attention levels may account for hypnotic depth and individual differences in hypnotizability is provided with traditional EEG rhythms, event-related potentials, and 40-Hz EEG activity. The alteration of stimulus perception may be a secondary effect with respect to allocation of attentional resources. In both nonhypnosis and hypnosis conditions, high hypnotizables appeared to show greater task-related EEG hemispheric shifts than did low hypnotizables. Findings concerning cognitive and physiological correlates of hypnotic analgesia are discussed with respect to hemispheric functioning in the apparent control of focused and sustained attention. The conclusion is that although a definitive EEG-based signature for hypnosis and hypnotizability is not yet established, there are a number of promising leads.
本文回顾并总结了基于脑电图(EEG)对催眠反应和催眠易感性的生理及认知指标的研究,特别关注了作者在该领域的系统性研究。通过传统脑电图节律、事件相关电位和40赫兹脑电图活动,提供了注意力水平差异可能解释催眠深度和催眠易感性个体差异的证据。刺激感知的改变可能是注意力资源分配的次要效应。在非催眠和催眠条件下,高催眠易感性个体似乎比低催眠易感性个体表现出更大的与任务相关的脑电图半球转移。关于催眠镇痛的认知和生理相关性的研究结果,结合在明显控制集中和持续注意力方面的半球功能进行了讨论。结论是,虽然尚未建立基于脑电图的明确的催眠和催眠易感性特征,但有许多有前景的线索。